[OpenPKG] Version Tracking Report (2002-04-06 08:20)

2002-04-05 Thread OpenPKG Version Tracker
OpenPKG Version Tracking Report === Reporting Time:2002-04-06 08:20 Tracking Duration: 00:1212 Tracking Input:373 sources (289 packages) Tracking Result: 357 up-to-date, 9 out-dated, 7 error The following 9 sources were determined to be out-dated beca

Re: Package candidates xfig and mgv

2002-04-05 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002, Michael Schloh von Bennewitz wrote: > Is there a reason that we don't list xfig and mgv as OpenPKG packages? Are > they too hard to package, or has anybody even tried yet? I'd like to add them > if its easy ;-) XFig is easy and should be done immediately as "xfig" together

Re: Status of the Sysadmin article

2002-04-05 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002, Michael Schloh von Bennewitz wrote: > The article is completely edited, and tagged RC1MICHAEL. That means that I > plan to not work on it until it comes back from the publisher. That doesn't > mean that it is finished. There is at least one FIXME, and probably some > formatt

Package candidates xfig and mgv

2002-04-05 Thread Michael Schloh von Bennewitz
Hello, Is there a reason that we don't list xfig and mgv as OpenPKG packages? Are they too hard to package, or has anybody even tried yet? I'd like to add them if its easy ;-) Regards, Michael -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Development Team, Application Services Cable & Wireless Deutschland GmbH ___

[OpenPKG] Version Tracking Report (2002-04-05 20:14)

2002-04-05 Thread OpenPKG Version Tracker
OpenPKG Version Tracking Report === Reporting Time:2002-04-05 20:14 Tracking Duration: 00:874 Tracking Input:373 sources (289 packages) Tracking Result: 363 up-to-date, 7 out-dated, 3 error The following 7 sources were determined to be out-dated becau

Status of the Sysadmin article

2002-04-05 Thread Michael Schloh von Bennewitz
Hello, The article is completely edited, and tagged RC1MICHAEL. That means that I plan to not work on it until it comes back from the publisher. That doesn't mean that it is finished. There is at least one FIXME, and probably some formatting left to do. Ralf, can you look at the FIXME which rega

[OpenPKG] Version Tracking Report (2002-04-05 16:53)

2002-04-05 Thread OpenPKG Version Tracker
OpenPKG Version Tracking Report === Reporting Time:2002-04-05 16:53 Tracking Duration: 00:996 Tracking Input:373 sources (289 packages) Tracking Result: 364 up-to-date, 6 out-dated, 3 error The following 6 sources were determined to be out-dated becau

Re: [CVS] OpenPKG: openpkg-doc/articles/sysadmin article.txt

2002-04-05 Thread Christoph Schug
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > On Fri, Apr 05, 2002, Christoph Schug wrote: > > > adjusted version of foo > > [...] > > -If you consider some day to upgrade to C just > > +If you consider some day to upgrade to C just > > What magic number is 1.5.3? If you dislike 0.8.15

Re: [CVS] OpenPKG: openpkg-doc/articles/sysadmin article.txt

2002-04-05 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002, Michael Schloh von Bennewitz wrote: > Please notice that you changed the capitalization scheme. I assume you changed > all others in your consistency committal. Should we change all titles to use > this scheme as well? Err.. no, my fault. I thought this was the scheme you u

Re: [CVS] OpenPKG: openpkg-doc/articles/sysadmin article.txt

2002-04-05 Thread Michael Schloh von Bennewitz
I vote for as much magic as possible ;-) M -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Development Team, Application Services Cable & Wireless Deutschland GmbH On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 03:32:44PM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > What magic number is 1.5.3? If you dislike 0.8.15, perhaps you want to > use something

Re: [CVS] OpenPKG: openpkg-doc/articles/sysadmin article.txt

2002-04-05 Thread Michael Schloh von Bennewitz
Hello Ralf, Please notice that you changed the capitalization scheme. I assume you changed all others in your consistency committal. Should we change all titles to use this scheme as well? Regards, Michael On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 03:26:13PM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > Modified files:

Re: [CVS] OpenPKG: openpkg-doc/articles/sysadmin article.txt

2002-04-05 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002, Christoph Schug wrote: > adjusted version of foo > [...] > -If you consider some day to upgrade to C just > +If you consider some day to upgrade to C just >repeat the installation in the same way, alter the symlink > -IC to point to C instead and re-run > +IC

Re: [CVS] OpenPKG: openpkg-doc/articles/sysadmin article.txt

2002-04-05 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002, Michael Schloh wrote: > Changed each case of 'admin' to 'system administrator' according to Ralf's > (administrator) and Michael's (system) taste. Neat compromise, Dude ;) Ralf S. Engelschall

Re: [CVS] OpenPKG: openpkg-doc/articles/sysadmin article.txt

2002-04-05 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002, Michael Schloh wrote: > [...] > When only one negation (no *) follows a single conjunction (with **) and > precedes multiple adjective/noun tuples (***), it must logically belong to the > first tuple. If negations and affirmations must be mixed, then the sentence

Re: OpenPKG 1.1 release packages status

2002-04-05 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002, Michael Schloh von Bennewitz wrote: > amd-6.0.7-20020206 Failed on FreeBSD (our dev1 where you tried it I guess) because the developer version of the flex package was installed. I removed this and installed the regular version and then it compiled fine, too. > hexer-0.

Re: [CVS] OpenPKG: openpkg-doc/articles/sysadmin article.txt

2002-04-05 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002, Michael Schloh wrote: > Changed almost all instances of 'administrator' to 'admin' because the > magazine is called 'Sysadmin'. This is a questionable committal, because some > might think that 'administrator' sounds more professional. Yes, I especially because

Re: OpenPKG 1.1 release packages status

2002-04-05 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002, Michael Schloh von Bennewitz wrote: > The following OpenPKG 1.0 release packages fail to build on our FreeBSD > reference machine. They should be fixed before we consider releasing OpenPKG > 1.1. By the way, I also tested the most current packages on the ftp server > yesterd

OpenPKG 1.1 release packages status

2002-04-05 Thread Michael Schloh von Bennewitz
Hello OpenPKG developers, The following OpenPKG 1.0 release packages fail to build on our FreeBSD reference machine. They should be fixed before we consider releasing OpenPKG 1.1. By the way, I also tested the most current packages on the ftp server yesterday with hopes that new versions could bu