OpenPKG Version Tracking Report
===
Reporting Time:2002-04-06 08:20
Tracking Duration: 00:1212
Tracking Input:373 sources (289 packages)
Tracking Result: 357 up-to-date, 9 out-dated, 7 error
The following 9 sources were determined to be out-dated beca
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002, Michael Schloh von Bennewitz wrote:
> Is there a reason that we don't list xfig and mgv as OpenPKG packages? Are
> they too hard to package, or has anybody even tried yet? I'd like to add them
> if its easy ;-)
XFig is easy and should be done immediately as "xfig" together
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002, Michael Schloh von Bennewitz wrote:
> The article is completely edited, and tagged RC1MICHAEL. That means that I
> plan to not work on it until it comes back from the publisher. That doesn't
> mean that it is finished. There is at least one FIXME, and probably some
> formatt
Hello,
Is there a reason that we don't list xfig and mgv as OpenPKG packages? Are
they too hard to package, or has anybody even tried yet? I'd like to add them
if its easy ;-)
Regards,
Michael
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Development Team, Application Services
Cable & Wireless Deutschland GmbH
___
OpenPKG Version Tracking Report
===
Reporting Time:2002-04-05 20:14
Tracking Duration: 00:874
Tracking Input:373 sources (289 packages)
Tracking Result: 363 up-to-date, 7 out-dated, 3 error
The following 7 sources were determined to be out-dated becau
Hello,
The article is completely edited, and tagged RC1MICHAEL. That means that I
plan to not work on it until it comes back from the publisher. That doesn't
mean that it is finished. There is at least one FIXME, and probably some
formatting left to do.
Ralf, can you look at the FIXME which rega
OpenPKG Version Tracking Report
===
Reporting Time:2002-04-05 16:53
Tracking Duration: 00:996
Tracking Input:373 sources (289 packages)
Tracking Result: 364 up-to-date, 6 out-dated, 3 error
The following 6 sources were determined to be out-dated becau
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2002, Christoph Schug wrote:
>
> > adjusted version of foo
> > [...]
> > -If you consider some day to upgrade to C just
> > +If you consider some day to upgrade to C just
>
> What magic number is 1.5.3? If you dislike 0.8.15
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002, Michael Schloh von Bennewitz wrote:
> Please notice that you changed the capitalization scheme. I assume you changed
> all others in your consistency committal. Should we change all titles to use
> this scheme as well?
Err.. no, my fault. I thought this was the scheme you u
I vote for as much magic as possible ;-)
M
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Development Team, Application Services
Cable & Wireless Deutschland GmbH
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 03:32:44PM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> What magic number is 1.5.3? If you dislike 0.8.15, perhaps you want to
> use something
Hello Ralf,
Please notice that you changed the capitalization scheme. I assume you changed
all others in your consistency committal. Should we change all titles to use
this scheme as well?
Regards,
Michael
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 03:26:13PM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> Modified files:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002, Christoph Schug wrote:
> adjusted version of foo
> [...]
> -If you consider some day to upgrade to C just
> +If you consider some day to upgrade to C just
>repeat the installation in the same way, alter the symlink
> -IC to point to C instead and re-run
> +IC
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002, Michael Schloh wrote:
> Changed each case of 'admin' to 'system administrator' according to Ralf's
> (administrator) and Michael's (system) taste.
Neat compromise, Dude ;)
Ralf S. Engelschall
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002, Michael Schloh wrote:
> [...]
> When only one negation (no *) follows a single conjunction (with **) and
> precedes multiple adjective/noun tuples (***), it must logically belong to the
> first tuple. If negations and affirmations must be mixed, then the sentence
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002, Michael Schloh von Bennewitz wrote:
> amd-6.0.7-20020206
Failed on FreeBSD (our dev1 where you tried it I guess) because the
developer version of the flex package was installed. I removed this and
installed the regular version and then it compiled fine, too.
> hexer-0.
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002, Michael Schloh wrote:
> Changed almost all instances of 'administrator' to 'admin' because the
> magazine is called 'Sysadmin'. This is a questionable committal, because some
> might think that 'administrator' sounds more professional.
Yes, I especially because
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002, Michael Schloh von Bennewitz wrote:
> The following OpenPKG 1.0 release packages fail to build on our FreeBSD
> reference machine. They should be fixed before we consider releasing OpenPKG
> 1.1. By the way, I also tested the most current packages on the ftp server
> yesterd
Hello OpenPKG developers,
The following OpenPKG 1.0 release packages fail to build on our FreeBSD
reference machine. They should be fixed before we consider releasing OpenPKG
1.1. By the way, I also tested the most current packages on the ftp server
yesterday with hopes that new versions could bu
18 matches
Mail list logo