OpenPKG Version Tracking Report
===
Reporting Time:2006-02-14 19:06
Tracking Duration: 1:18:59 (H:M:S)
Tracking Input:1784 sources (929 packages)
Tracking Result: 1688 up-to-date, 44 out-dated, 52 error
The following 44 sources were determined to be
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006, Bill Campbell wrote:
[...]
Since this is mostly a style issue, can we suggest as a matter of policy
that the substitutions be put in the %build section?
Yes, I vote for doing it this way.
I'll be doing several updates to
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006, Bill Campbell wrote:
[...]
Since this is mostly a style issue, can we suggest as a matter of policy
that the substitutions be put in the %build section?
Yes, I vote for
Bill Campbell[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2006-02-13 23:35:10:
I would like to suggest that any %{l_shtool} subst subsitutions don't belong
in the %setup section, but properly belong at the beginning of the %build
section.
I remember we put some efforts into moving almost every patch-like
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006, Thomas Lotterer wrote:
Bill Campbell[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2006-02-13 23:35:10:
I would like to suggest that any %{l_shtool} subst subsitutions don't belong
in the %setup section, but properly belong at the beginning of the %build
section.
I remember we put some
OpenPKG Version Tracking Report
===
Reporting Time:2006-02-15 06:51
Tracking Duration: 1:08:33 (H:M:S)
Tracking Input:1784 sources (929 packages)
Tracking Result: 1476 up-to-date, 44 out-dated, 264 error
The following 44 sources were determined to be
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006, Thomas Lotterer wrote:
Bill Campbell[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2006-02-13 23:35:10:
I would like to suggest that any %{l_shtool} subst subsitutions don't belong
in the %setup section, but properly belong at the beginning of the %build
section.
I remember we put
