On Wed, Jul 11, 2007, Thomas Lotterer wrote:
> The topic is about how to handle with_foo for a with_foo_bar option that
> only makes sense in concert with with_foo.
>
> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2007, Christoph Schug wrote:
> >
> > For me, it looks more like the second [implicit] case, but I might be
> >
The topic is about how to handle with_foo for a with_foo_bar option that
only makes sense in concert with with_foo.
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2007, Christoph Schug wrote:
>
> For me, it looks more like the second [implicit] case, but I might be
> wrong. If not, there should be some fiddling in the "fixin
On Tuesday, 10. July 2007 at 1:51 pm, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2007, Christoph Schug wrote:
>> to raise the issue here on the list. apache-php provides an option
>> called 'with_imap_annotate'. It's unclear to me whether this in an
>> independent option or it's just a variant of
