On Monday 23 July 2007 10:17:46 Mark Keller wrote:
> I understand that the sendmail people made a poor choice in using
> include/libmiter/*.h, but they did. Since enough packages do rely on the
> include files, I think that changing the location seems to make a lot of
> extra work. Now all other p
On Monday 23 July 2007 03:17:40 Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> If we would just have the "milter" package I also would vote for
> renaming it to "libmilter" immediately. But what about the "milter-xxx"
> packages? They use the "milter" prefix to show their correlation to the
> "milter" package. Unti
The following OpenPKG Contribution Area operation occurred.
uploaded DIFF file "mysql41.diff" accepted -- moved to contrib area.
No action is required on your part.
__
OpenPKG http://open
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007, Birger Krägelin wrote:
> > > Anyhow, I am wondering why the decision was made to move the milter
> > include
> > > files to milter/*.h instead of the default libmilter/*.h? If
> > something really
> > > needs the includes in milter/*.h maybe a symbolic link should be made
> >
> > Anyhow, I am wondering why the decision was made to move the milter
> include
> > files to milter/*.h instead of the default libmilter/*.h? If
> something really
> > needs the includes in milter/*.h maybe a symbolic link should be made
> so it
> > works for both locations.
> > Maybe I am just m
