RE: Happy Birthday OpenPKG Foundation!

Happy Birthday and congratulations!!! Wishing the openpkg foundation and community another productive year! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ralf S. Engelschall Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 1:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: openpkg-use

Configuring openpkg rpm naming from ix86.suse9.3 to ix86.kernel2.6

Is there a way I can configure openpkg to name the rpms from ix86,suse9.3 to ix86.kernel2.6? Basically, using a naming of architecture class and system technology (in openpkg terminology). If possible, are there any consequences of making such a change? Thanks Christopher Chan [EMAIL

Configuring openpkg rpm naming from ix86.suse9.3 to ix86.kernel2.6

Is there a way I can configure openpkg to name the rpms from ix86,suse9.3 to ix86.kernel2.6? Basically, using a naming of architecture class and system technology (in openpkg terminology). If possible, are there any consequences of making such a change? Thanks Christopher Chan [EMAIL

VMWare GSX Server

platforms with this solution? We also use OpenPKG on different platforms and do builds and tests, and we are looking for a more optimal solution than a physical machine. Thanks in advanced. Christopher Chan email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] work: 650-561-0227 "One of the secrets of life is to

OpenPKG 2.0/20040609 on Fedora Core 2

ull value Does anyone know what the issue is here? I see on the build status page that Fedora Core 2 is supported, so what needs to be done in order to get openpkg to compile and install correctly? Thanks. Christopher Chan email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] work: 650-561-0227 __

Ability to change default l_musr, l_mgrp, l_rusr, l_rgrp after OpenPKG installation

. Christopher Chan email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] work: 650-561-0227 "One of the secrets of life is to make stepping stones out of stumbling blocks" __ The OpenP

Dependency Errprs: libc.so.6, libdl.so.2, libpthread.so.0, librt.so.1

ython-2.0.1-0.spike.0.1 libutil.so.1(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by libredcarpet-python-2.0.1-0.spike.0.1 Christopher Chan email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] work: 650-561-0227 "One of the secrets of life is to make stepping sto

RE: /bin/sh is needed by xxxxx package

Using Provides: /bin/sh seems to solve the problem., for now. I'm very positive I am using OpenPKG (CURRENT), since the rpm install installs it in the openpkg root. Thanks for the help.

Re: /bin/sh is needed by xxxxx package

5 Jan 2004, Christopher Chan wrote: > What do I need to do to the spec in order for rpm to not complain about > the /bin/sh or even to /usr/bin/env dependency when there is a /bin/sh > that does exist. Probably you didn't use openpkg's rpm (this includes patch to remove the /bin

man pages for shtool

Is there any man page or other documentation for shtool other then the script itself? Trying to understand more about it so I know when and where are the best places to use it. Christopher Chan email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] work: 650-561-0227

/bin/sh is needed by xxxxx package

What do I need to do to the spec in order for rpm to not complain about the /bin/sh or even to /usr/bin/env dependency when there is a /bin/sh that does exist. Thanks Christopher Chan email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] work: 650-561-0227

Re: librpm shared libraries

nly thing I don't quit understand is that it tried to dynamically the library as librpm.so.0 instead of just librpm.so. As soon as I linked the to librom.so.), it seemed to work. Will need to do more testing to verify, but thanks a bunch for helping me find a solution!!! Much appreciated.

Re: librpm shared libraries

please inform me before I get into a possible "rat hole". Thanks much. - Christopher Chan >We do not build RPM with a shared library. If you want those shared >library versions of librpm you have to manually try to change the >openpkg.spec to achieve this, but keep in mind

librpm shared libraries

. Where can I find the OpenPKG librpm shared libs? If they do not exist for distribution, how do I build them? Thanks. Christopher Chan email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] work: 650-561-0227

Bootstrap install error when using --prefix

onality suppose to work?  and will all my subsequent rpm installs using openpkg rpms put the install under the new prefix??? Christopher Chan email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] work: 650-561-0227

OpenPKG RPM database question

my system already has them installed? A lot of package specs requires perl, python, gcc, glib2, etc Thanks - Christopher Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ The OpenPKG Projectwww.openpkg.org User

Re: rpmbuild??? missing with openpkg-20031228-20031228

Nevermind, I found it, it did not install when I installed from shell script, but installed when I installed from the rpm the bootstrap had built. Christopher Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] main: 650-561-0222 work: 650-561-0227

rpmbuild??? missing with openpkg-20031228-20031228

Where is rpmbuild??  I installed the openpkg-20031228-20031228 from CURRENT to use apache2-2.0.48-20031028.src.rpm, but am unable to find rpmbuild since rpm does not support rpm --rebuild anymore. Thanks. Christopher Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] main: 650-561-0222 work: 650-561-0227