Well I would suggest to Ralf to tweak the binutils to rename as and ld
in gas and gld as does IBM in their own spec, just to be sure the gnu
as and ld won't be used.
26 Jul 2005 19:55:25 +0200, Simon J Mudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [snip]
> > All I did
Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
> All I did was grab the CVS version of gcc.spec and rebuild the rpm -
> openpkg rpm -bb gcc.spec --define="l_cc gcc" --define="with_binutils no".
Understood. I assume that you did NOT have the openpkg binutils rpm
installed? If it is installed, i
Simon J Mudd wrote:
Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{l_prefix}/lib/$subdir
done
mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{l_prefix}/${triple}/include/* \
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROT
Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
> > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{l_prefix}/lib/$subdir
> > done
> > mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{l_prefix}/${triple}/include/* \
> >Ralf S. Engelschall
> >[EMAIL PRO
# package options
%option with_cxx yes
%option with_objc no
%option with_java no
%option with_f77 no
%option with_optimize yes
%option with_profile no
%option with_binutils no
%option with_threads yes
%option with_g
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005, Henri Gomez wrote:
> [...]
Ok, these install changes are not incorporated into the "gcc", "gcc40" and
"gcc41" packages of CURRENT...
So, does all this mean that with "--without binutils" these latest
CURRENT packages of GCC now build out of the box under AIX?
Ditto on AIX 5.2 / PASE
Wrote: /QOpenSys/openpkg/RPM/PKG/gcc-3.4.4-2.4.0.src.rpm
Wrote: /QOpenSys/openpkg/RPM/PKG/gcc-3.4.4-2.4.0.powerpc-aix5.2-openpkg.rpm
Thanks Ralf
2005/7/25, Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 22, 2005, Ralf S. Engelschall wrot
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005, Doug Summers wrote:
[...]
I was also able to get GCC to build, by using --define="with_binutils
no" and removing the RPM version of binutils. The mv command is failing
because of the parent dir
I'm trying your patch right now Ralf, tell you more after the build
2005/7/22, Ralf S. Engelschall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2005, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 22, 2005, Doug Summers wrote:
> >
> > > [...]
> > > I was also able to get GCC to build, by using --define=
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2005, Doug Summers wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > I was also able to get GCC to build, by using --define="with_binutils
> > no" and removing the RPM version of binutils. The mv command is failing
> > because of the parent directory being d
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005, Doug Summers wrote:
> [...]
> I was also able to get GCC to build, by using --define="with_binutils
> no" and removing the RPM version of binutils. The mv command is failing
> because of the parent directory being deleted a couple of commands
> before. I really think it's the
Simon J Mudd wrote:
I have managed to get the 3.4.4 gcc to build on AIX 5.1 using the
following "hacks" to the standard rpm spec file.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] COS4 ~]$ diff -u gcc.spec.orig gcc.spec
--- gcc.spec.orig 2005-07-22 08:35:44.018919511 +0200
+++ gcc.spec2005-07-22 08:35:38.505805
Thanks for your work on this area and as soon as you got a patched
gcc.spec, thanks to send it to the list.
I'll try it on AIX 5.2/PASE
2005/7/22, Simon J Mudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have managed to get the 3.4.4 gcc to build on AIX 5.1 using the
> following "hacks" to the standard rpm spec fil
13 matches
Mail list logo
