Re: openpkg 1.1.0 questions

2002-09-04 Thread Michael Schloh von Bennewitz
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002, Miles Egan wrote: > It's still getting "power macintosh" from somewhere. The bootstrap script dies > trying to run this command: > > uuencode openpkg-20020904-20020904.power macintosh-darwin6.0-pd.tar.Z > > Tracing it back it looks like it gets this string by running: > > "rp

Re: openpkg 1.1.0 questions

2002-09-04 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002, Miles Egan wrote: > It's still getting "power macintosh" from somewhere. The bootstrap script dies > trying to run this command: > > uuencode openpkg-20020904-20020904.power macintosh-darwin6.0-pd.tar.Z > > Tracing it back it looks like it gets this string by running: > > "

Re: openpkg 1.1.0 questions

2002-09-04 Thread Miles Egan
It's still getting "power macintosh" from somewhere. The bootstrap script dies trying to run this command: uuencode openpkg-20020904-20020904.power macintosh-darwin6.0-pd.tar.Z Tracing it back it looks like it gets this string by running: "rpm --eval %_target" I'll see if I can dig into this

Re: openpkg 1.1.0 questions

2002-09-04 Thread Miles Egan
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 07:23:57PM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > On Tue, Sep 03, 2002, Miles Egan wrote: > > > 1. Previous releases included make in the openpkg base package. This no longer > > seems to be the case, at least in my builds. Is this deliberate? > > No, the bootstrapping pa

Re: openpkg 1.1.0 questions

2002-09-04 Thread Michael Schloh von Bennewitz
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002, Miles Egan wrote: > Applying the following patch gives me "powerpc-apple-darwin6.0", which is what > the config.guess script from rpm gives me. Is this reasonable? > Your patch is in the build. Please download and try out ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/current/SRC/openpkg-2002090

Re: openpkg 1.1.0 questions

2002-09-03 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002, Miles Egan wrote: > 1. Previous releases included make in the openpkg base package. This no longer > seems to be the case, at least in my builds. Is this deliberate? No, the bootstrapping package named "openpkg" never included GNU make -- not in 1.0 nor in any -CURRENT v

Re: openpkg 1.1.0 questions

2002-09-03 Thread Miles Egan
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 11:59:22PM +0200, Michael Schloh von Bennewitz wrote: > On Tue, Sep 03, 2002, Miles Egan wrote: > > uname -a: > > > > Darwin bunny.pixar.com 6.0 Darwin Kernel Version 6.0: Sat Jul 27 13:18:52 PDT > > 2002; root:xnu/xnu-344.obj~1/RELEASE_PPC Power Macintosh powerpc > > > >

Re: openpkg 1.1.0 questions

2002-09-03 Thread Miles Egan
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 06:25:09PM +0200, Michael Schloh von Bennewitz wrote: > Please stay tuned for an answer to your first question. Regarding Darwin and > power macintosh, I think we can do something about that. Please send the > output of 'uname -a', and it may be listed in the next release a

Re: openpkg 1.1.0 questions

2002-09-03 Thread Michael Schloh von Bennewitz
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002, Miles Egan wrote: > Two questions: > >[...] > > 2. Are there any plans for Os X / Darwin support? The bootstrap procedure > seems to work but the bootstrap package fails to install because the platform is > identified as "power macintosh" and the space breaks the script. W

openpkg 1.1.0 questions

2002-09-03 Thread Miles Egan
Two questions: 1. Previous releases included make in the openpkg base package. This no longer seems to be the case, at least in my builds. Is this deliberate? 2. Are there any plans for Os X / Darwin support? The bootstrap procedure seems to work but the bootstrap package fails to install b