It seems that for some reason gcc is not acknowledging
our /usr/local/include directory in it's includes when building. In
fact, there is this specific bit in the spec file:
%{l_shtool} subst -v -s \
-e 's;PREFIX_INCLUDE_DIR;PREFIX_INCLUDE_DIR_DISABLED;g' \
gcc/configure
We
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007, David M. Fetter wrote:
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 13:25 -0700, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007, David M. Fetter wrote:
It seems that for some reason gcc is not acknowledging
our /usr/local/include directory in it's includes when building. In
fact, there is this
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 13:40 -0700, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007, David M. Fetter wrote:
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 13:25 -0700, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007, David M. Fetter wrote:
It seems that for some reason gcc is not acknowledging
our /usr/local/include directory
gcc with fortran from current (4.1.2) builds for me under debian/ubuntu. If
you haven't already, I would build gcc without fortran, and then rebuild it
with fortran so it builds using the same version of openpkg gcc and not the
system compiler. I have seen cases with several packages where the
Ya, we did just that already. We need gcc to exist in general, but a
specific group of folks want gcc with_fortran, so we need to have that
as well. Believe me, I wouldn't be spending time on it if somebody
didn't specifically request it. ;-)
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 11:51 -0500, Doug Henry
Ya, I did that already. It has the same failure.
On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 22:27 +0100, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007, David M. Fetter wrote:
In the 2.20061018 stable release gcc fails to build on RHEL4 (either
32-bit or 64-bit arch) when enabling the with_fortran option.
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007, David M. Fetter wrote:
Ya, I did that already. It has the same failure.
It looks like some structure is missing members.
Look at line 2440 in this file to see what structure is referenced with the
term gfc_expr:
/usr/local/RPM/USER/TMP/gcc-4.1.1/obj/../gcc/fortran/arith.c
Thanks. I'll try that out.
On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 16:18 -0800, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007, David M. Fetter wrote:
Ya, I did that already. It has the same failure.
It looks like some structure is missing members.
Look at line 2440 in this file to see what structure is
