Dear all,
Am 08.10.2016 um 22:35 schrieb Alexander Matheisen:
Am Freitag, den 07.10.2016, 13:07 +0200 schrieb Denis Stein:
Similar topic, same issue: Can/Shall the lifecycle tagging scheme
also
be used for nodes?
E.g., near Hamburg Hbf. a node [1] is currently tagged as follows:
Am Freitag, den 07.10.2016, 13:07 +0200 schrieb Denis Stein:
> Similar topic, same issue: Can/Shall the lifecycle tagging scheme
> also
> be used for nodes?
>
> E.g., near Hamburg Hbf. a node [1] is currently tagged as follows:
>
> >
> > railway:disused=switch
> > railway:local_operated=no
> >
Dear all,
Am 26.09.2016 um 17:24 schrieb Michael Reichert:
Active: railway=rail;*=*
Removed: railway=abandoned;abandoned:railway=rail;abandoned:*=*
abanoned:railway=* (aka lifecycle tagging scheme) competes with the
tagging used for non-operational roads (e.g. highway=construction +