Hi Hans,
Thanks for the patch. But, this change is not in scope of this ticket.
You can create a ticket for adding su in oper state and we can take test it in
those scenarios.
Thanks
-Nagu
-Original Message-
From: Hans Feldt [mailto:hans.fe...@ericsson.com]
Sent: 21 November
Oops, forgot about that one. It is fixed now.
thanks,
Anders Widell
2013-12-02 07:43, Ramesh Betham skrev:
Hi Anders,
make rpm fails, please check. (osaf_poll.h, osaf_time.h should add in
../osaf/libs/core/common/includeMakefile.am)
Thanks,
Ramesh.
libopensaf_common_la-osaf_poll.lo -MD
The POLLHUP seems to happen quite frequently (revents=17), so I will
filter the log messages in that case.
regards,
Anders Widell
2013-11-29 09:53, Mathivanan Naickan Palanivelu skrev:
Ack.
Good that you were able to work on this ticket, would be a good value add.
One comment is that, we
Summary: logsv: Handle log files on both active and standby
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): #152
Peer Reviewer(s):
Pull request to: LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE
Affected branch(es): default (4.4)
Development branch: IF ANY GIVE THE REPO URL
Impacted
Hi,
It seems (from my testing) that the patch fixes the problem for
pre-instantiable service units. But most likely not for
non-pre-instantiable SUs.
Your code comment started my thinking that we should really be checking SUs
Readiness State for INSERVICE instead.
Which means
Hi Hans,
NPI is not started till given assignment, so I don't understand, why
npi su should be considered or was rather left out in the patch ? Please
elaborate.
I will change the function name.
Thanks
-Nagu
-Original Message-
From: Hans Feldt [mailto:hans.fe...@ericsson.com]
The readiness state of a non-pre-instantiable service unit is in-service if
all of
the following conditions are met:
* its operational state and the operational state of its containing node is
enabled
So what I mean is the logic cannot check presence state since NPI SUs would not
be
Hi,
I am confused by this:
saCkptTrack - This function enable the Ckpt Track call back
saCkptCheckpointTrack - This function enables the specific Checkpoint Track
call back
The latter is empty, can you explain?
Thanks,
Hans
On 12/02/2013 07:37 AM, mahesh.va...@oracle.com wrote:
Summary: IMM: Update the README file to document NO_DANGLING [#635]
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 635
Peer Reviewer(s): Neel ; Zoran
Pull request to:
Affected branch(es): default(4.4)
Development branch:
Impacted area Impact y/n
osaf/tools/safimm/immadm/imm_admin.c | 15 +++
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/osaf/tools/safimm/immadm/imm_admin.c
b/osaf/tools/safimm/immadm/imm_admin.c
--- a/osaf/tools/safimm/immadm/imm_admin.c
+++ b/osaf/tools/safimm/immadm/imm_admin.c
@@ -37,6
Summary: IMM: immadm aware of admowner safImmService for
opensafImm=opensafImm,safApp=safImmService [#642]
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 642
Peer Reviewer(s): Neel
Pull request to:
Affected branch(es): default(4.4)
Development branch:
Impacted area
Hi,
The scope of this patch is primarily to convert the existing
functionality to SAF API syntax.
i.e The existing functionality supports tracking checkpoint writes per
(user- initialized handle) SaCkptHandleT .
So, this existing functionality shall be provided by this API saCkptTrack().
Summary:cpsv: Memory Leaks when reploc node add delete in cpd [#529]
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): #529
Peer Reviewer(s): Ramesh
Pull request to: LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE
Affected branch(es): default
Development branch: default
Impacted area
osaf/libs/common/cpsv/include/cpd_cb.h | 5 +-
osaf/services/saf/cpsv/cpd/cpd_db.c| 38 +++
osaf/services/saf/cpsv/cpd/cpd_imm.c | 39 ++-
osaf/services/saf/cpsv/cpd/cpd_proc.c | 32 +--
osaf/services/saf/cpsv/cpd/cpd_sbevt.c |
14 matches
Mail list logo
