Gets a bit long, how about init_clc_cli_attributes?
Ok.
-Nagu
-Original Message-
From: Hans Feldt [mailto:hans.fe...@ericsson.com]
Sent: 04 February 2014 13:15
To: Nagendra Kumar
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [devel] [PATCH 2 of 2] amfnd: ignore
Hum, would wait for that.
Here I am not able to understand your comments, please elaborate on that.
Do you mean to break short or long commit message into three parts and name the
sections?
Give some example.
Thanks
-Nagu
-Original Message-
From: Hans Feldt
Hi AndersBj,
Reviewed and tested the patch.
Ack.
/Neel.
On Friday 31 January 2014 09:26 PM, Anders Bjornerstedt wrote:
Summary: IMM: Avoid repeated lookup of admo in abort of ccbCreate [#724]
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 724
Peer Reviewer(s): Neel; Surender
Pull request to:
Affected
Summary: amfnd : handle successful cleanup of assigned comp gracefully in
shutdown phase [#767]
Review request for Trac Ticket(s):AMF #767
Peer Reviewer(s): Hans F., Hans N., Nagendra
Pull request to: LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE
Affected branch(es):All
Development branch: IF ANY
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/clc.cc | 26 --
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
During opensaf shutdown AMFND removes the SIs from the SUs in the reverse order
of their ranks. At component level this gets translated as
giving csi
Summary: amfnd : avoid accessing csi_list in comp after removal of assignments
[#739]
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): AMF #739
Peer Reviewer(s):Hans F., Hans N., Nagendra
Pull request to: LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE
Affected branch(es):All
Development branch: IF ANY GIVE THE REPO
People who ware viewing Mail text format didint received the performance
statistics Table ,
please find it as attachment .
-AVM
On 2/4/2014 3:59 PM, A V Mahesh wrote:
Hi All,
This patch adjusted the MDS send fragmentation size from 1400 to
65479. This value is derived
from
I am not seeing any attachment.
Can you please send it in text format.
Thanks,
Praveen
On 04-Feb-14 4:11 PM, A V Mahesh wrote:
People who ware viewing Mail text format didint received the
performance statistics Table ,
please find it as attachment .
-AVM
On 2/4/2014 3:59 PM, A V Mahesh
I am not sure if I fully understand the use case. You say that this is
for failover without OS reboot, but at the same time you say that FM
will stay alive until it is killed by the OS reboot, and the peer FM
will not take over until it receives a service down of FM. Could you
elaborate a bit
- anders.wid...@ericsson.com wrote:
I am not sure if I fully understand the use case. You say that this is
for failover without OS reboot, but at the same time you say that FM
will stay alive until it is killed by the OS reboot, and the peer FM
will not take over until it receives a
Hi,
Is anybody else facing the same problem?
Making all in tests/ntfsv
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/mnaickan/staging/tests/ntfsv'
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `util.c', needed by `ntftest-util.o'. Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/mnaickan/staging/tests/ntfsv'
make[1]: ***
Ok, now I see what you mean. In the case of failover without OS reboot,
the FM process is terminated and will not perform the waiting.
/ Anders Widell
2014-02-04 12:56, Mathivanan Naickan Palanivelu skrev:
- anders.wid...@ericsson.com wrote:
I am not sure if I fully understand the use
Yes try:
rm -rf osaf
hg revert -a
/Hans
-Original Message-
From: Mathivanan Naickan Palanivelu [mailto:mathi.naic...@oracle.com]
Sent: den 4 februari 2014 13:23
To: Opensaf-Devel
Subject: [devel] building test code is failing
Hi,
Is anybody else facing the same problem?
Well, except for the code in the agent library. That code must be
written in C.
regards,
Anders Widell
2014-02-04 15:59, Anders Widell skrev:
Hi guys!
Just to let you know: we are trying to move away from the patricia tree
code and use C++ STL instead. So if you already have implemented
Hi guys!
Just to let you know: we are trying to move away from the patricia tree
code and use C++ STL instead. So if you already have implemented this
with an STL map, there is no need to port it to use the patricia tree.
regards,
Anders Widell
2014-02-04 15:24, Domrachev, Mikhail skrev:
Hi,
Privyet Mihkail!
I have the work done, but I don't have the patch file created yet. I was
going to create a ticket, and attach the patch to it.
I will try to do it today.
I will let you know.
Alex
On 02/04/2014 09:24 AM, Domrachev, Mikhail wrote:
Hi, Alex.
Currently I'm fixing that issue
You are right , the less time taken is with #654 Patch , I just
corrected it
please check below.
-AVM
On 2/4/2014 5:48 PM, Anders Björnerstedt wrote:
Hi Mahesh,
Under each point both pairs of figures are headed by Without #654 Patch.
I think one of them should bw With #654 patch right ?
Summary:cpsv: cpd broadcast cpnd down to all cpnd opened the same ckpt [#530]
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): #530
Peer Reviewer(s):Sirisha/Mathi
Pull request to: LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE
Affected branch(es): all
Development branch: default
osaf/services/saf/cpsv/cpd/cpd_proc.c | 10 +-
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Cpd while processing a cpnd/node down need to send a broadcast the info to
all CPNDs which are also have the same checkpoint replicas ,
to delete the existing/down remote Cpnd details
So they are not exactly duplicates scenarios, but similar and possibly reverse
order of operation scnarios.
The intent is to descibe why you would get say ERR_BAD_OPERATION for a
ccbObjectCreate ot for a
ccbObjectDelete. The point here is that you get these errros for the
repsective
20 matches
Mail list logo
