Re: [devel] [PATCH 1/1] msgnd: prevent race condition during q transfer [#2816]

2018-03-21 Thread Srinivas Mangipudy
Hi Alex, Ack from my side, code review only. Thank you Srinivas -Original Message- From: Alex Jones [mailto:ajo...@rbbn.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 9:25 PM To: Srinivas Mangipudy Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Alex Jones

[devel] Performance benchmark for OpenSAF message services

2018-03-21 Thread Feng Xie
Hi, We are evaluating OpenSAF as an open-source middleware solution. Our target environment is a single-node embedded system for now and may be extended to a cluster later. Performance of OpenSAF services, especially messages, notification and event distribution, is important for us.

Re: [devel] Errors in running OpenSAF message sample

2018-03-21 Thread Feng Xie
Hi Alex, Thanks a lot for the help. I try to run OpenSAF in a single node environment. It turned out that the failure of message sample program is due to nodes.cfg. Initially, I created a two-node configuration with "immxml-clustersize -s 2" with the assumption that two

[devel] [PATCH 1/1] plmd: connect to hypervisor after middleware switchover [#2817]

2018-03-21 Thread Alex Jones
After a middleware switchover, EE admin commands that need hypervisor support do not work (e.g. unlock-in, abrupt restart). After the switchover, the plmcds on the different nodes reconnect to the new plmd. But, the new plmd does not make any contact with the hypervisors. So, the commands fail.

[devel] [PATCH 0/1] Review Request for plmd: connect to hypervisor after middleware switchover [#2817]

2018-03-21 Thread Alex Jones
Summary: plmd: connect to hypervisor after middleware switchover [#2817] Review request for Ticket(s): 2817 Peer Reviewer(s): Mathi, Ravi Pull request to: Affected branch(es): develop Development branch: ticket-2817 Base revision: dc467e7e143d113bc11445c909bd8520aed6dfd7 Personal repository:

Re: [devel] [PATCH 1/1] mds: improve thread safety in mdstest [#2746]

2018-03-21 Thread Zoran Milinkovic
Hi, According to the patch (I haven't checked the code), I don't see the reason for using rwlock. Pthread mutex will even work better than rwlock in the patch. Reasons for using mutex: 1. Mutex is much faster than rwlock in Linux, around 10 times faster, if I remember correctly 2. Here, we are

Re: [devel] [PATCH 1/1] amf: do not dereference null pointer [#2791]

2018-03-21 Thread Syam Prasad Talluri
Hi Gary, I tried to analyze the flows in MDS code to figure out the root cause, but it is of vain. Can you please give me the reproducible scenario, I will try out by adding debug logs Thanks, Syam. -Original Message- From: Ravi Sekhar Reddy Konda Sent: Monday, March 19, 2018 10:28

[devel] [PATCH 0/1] Review Request for mds: improve thread safety in mdstest [#2746]

2018-03-21 Thread Hoa Le
Summary: mds: improve thread safety in mdstest [#2746] Review request for Ticket(s): 2746 Peer Reviewer(s): Hans, Anders Pull request to: Hans, Anders Affected branch(es): develop, release Development branch: ticket-2746 Base revision: dc467e7e143d113bc11445c909bd8520aed6dfd7 Personal repository:

[devel] [PATCH 1/1] mds: improve thread safety in mdstest [#2746]

2018-03-21 Thread Hoa Le
- Correct helgrind issues in mds/apitest --- src/mds/apitest/mdstest.c | 7 +- src/mds/apitest/mdstipc.h | 7 +- src/mds/apitest/mdstipc_api.c | 196 + src/mds/apitest/mdstipc_conf.c | 89 +-- 4 files changed, 234