Summary: osaf: Update the commit message template [#791]
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 791
Peer Reviewer(s): TLC
Pull request to:
Affected branch(es): opensaf-4.2.x, opensaf-4.3.x, opensaf-4.4.x, default(4.5)
Development branch: default
--------------------------------
Impacted area Impact y/n
--------------------------------
Docs n
Build system n
RPM/packaging n
Configuration files n
Startup scripts n
SAF services n
OpenSAF services n
Core libraries n
Samples n
Tests n
Other y
Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
changeset 27485a5e44ed4fbc542f24ecc11a6c97df9c5bc8
Author: Anders Widell <anders.wid...@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 17:40:30 +0100
osaf: Update the commit message template [#791]
Update the commit message template with the agreeed format for how to
write
commit messages in OpenSAF. Add a shell script that can be used to set
the
default commit message in Mercurial to the commit message template.
Complete diffstat:
------------------
tools/devel/review/00-README | 77
+++++++++++++----------------------------------------------------------------
tools/devel/review/commit.template | 51
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
tools/devel/review/hgeditor.sh | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
Testing Commands:
-----------------
Execute the commands listed in tools/devel/review/00-README for setting the
default commit message in Mercurial. Test it by running e.g. hg commit
Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
Default commit message in Mercurial should be the commit message template.
Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
Ack from TLC
Arch Built Started Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips n n
mips64 n n
x86 n n
x86_64 n n
powerpc n n
powerpc64 n n
Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]
Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):
___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
that need proper data filled in.
___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.
___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header
___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.
___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.
___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.
___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
(i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)
___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.
___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.
___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.
___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.
___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
too much content into a single commit.
___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)
___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.
___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.
___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
of what has changed between each re-send.
___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.
___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)
___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
the threaded patch review.
___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
for in-service upgradability test.
___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the Whitepaper.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
