Summary: amf: remove unnecessary #includes [#680] Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 680 Peer Reviewer(s): Hans F, Hans N Pull request to: Affected branch(es): default Development branch: default
-------------------------------- Impacted area Impact y/n -------------------------------- Docs n Build system n RPM/packaging n Configuration files n Startup scripts n SAF services y OpenSAF services n Core libraries n Samples n Tests n Other n Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above): --------------------------------------------- This patch series corrects "Unnecessary header file (HFA)" errors reported by Coverity. changeset 95725e699d9b738dcad359cac228266e7890220b Author: Gary Lee <gary....@dektech.com.au> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:57:41 +1100 amfd: remove unnecessary #includes [#680] remove unnecessary #includes as reported by Coverity changeset 89e847376dc5f26179a08542d5fb81c244751135 Author: Gary Lee <gary....@dektech.com.au> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:57:41 +1100 amfnd: remove unnecessary #includes [#680] remove unnecessary #includes as reported by Coverity Complete diffstat: ------------------ osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/app.cc | 1 - osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/apptype.cc | 2 -- osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/cluster.cc | 1 - osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/nodegroup.cc | 1 - osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/nodeswbundle.cc | 1 - osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/role.cc | 1 - osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sg_nwayact_fsm.cc | 1 - osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sgtype.cc | 1 - osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/si.cc | 1 - osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sirankedsu.cc | 1 - osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sutype.cc | 1 - osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/svctype.cc | 2 -- osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/clm.cc | 2 -- osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/main.cc | 1 - 14 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) Testing Commands: ----------------- <<LIST THE COMMAND LINE TOOLS/STEPS TO TEST YOUR CHANGES>> Testing, Expected Results: -------------------------- <<PASTE COMMAND OUTPUTS / TEST RESULTS>> Conditions of Submission: ------------------------- <<HOW MANY DAYS BEFORE PUSHING, CONSENSUS ETC>> Arch Built Started Linux distro ------------------------------------------- mips n n mips64 n n x86 n n x86_64 n n powerpc n n powerpc64 n n Reviewer Checklist: ------------------- [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!] Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries): ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries that need proper data filled in. ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push. ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable. ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text. ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits. ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc) ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests. Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing. ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed. ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs. ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits. ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is too much content into a single commit. ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc) ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent; Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled. ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded commits, or place in a public tree for a pull. ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication of what has changed between each re-send. ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review. ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc) ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the the threaded patch review. ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results for in-service upgradability test. ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel