Re: [devel] [PATCH 1/1] imm: update README with IMM changes in OpenSAF 5.17.11 [#2665]

2017-11-03 Thread Zoran Milinkovic
Hi Vu, That paragraph is talking about implementer names, and it's still valid. Ticket #2579 is about appliers. Thanks, Zoran -Original Message- From: Vu Minh Nguyen [mailto:vu.m.ngu...@dektech.com.au] Sent: den 3 november 2017 11:31 To: Zoran Milinkovic

Re: [devel] [PATCH 1/1] imm: update README with IMM changes in OpenSAF 5.17.11 [#2665]

2017-11-03 Thread Vu Minh Nguyen
Hi Zoran, Ack with one below question. In README, it states: "A word of caution about implementer names. Implementer names are to be re-used. They are never garbage collected by the imm service. An implementer-name may have no current live implementer handle attached, but once created, it

[devel] [PATCH 1/1] imm: update README with IMM changes in OpenSAF 5.17.11 [#2665]

2017-11-02 Thread Zoran Milinkovic
Add two sections. The section that describes the new flag for enabling features in 5.17.11, and the section that describes the removal of disconnected appliers --- src/imm/README | 66 ++ 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+) diff --git