Hi Vu,
That paragraph is talking about implementer names, and it's still valid.
Ticket #2579 is about appliers.
Thanks,
Zoran
-Original Message-
From: Vu Minh Nguyen [mailto:vu.m.ngu...@dektech.com.au]
Sent: den 3 november 2017 11:31
To: Zoran Milinkovic
Hi Zoran,
Ack with one below question.
In README, it states:
"A word of caution about implementer names. Implementer names are to
be re-used. They are never garbage collected by the imm service.
An implementer-name may have no current live implementer handle attached,
but once created, it
Add two sections.
The section that describes the new flag for enabling features in 5.17.11,
and the section that describes the removal of disconnected appliers
---
src/imm/README | 66 ++
1 file changed, 66 insertions(+)
diff --git