Ack (Reviewed only)
Thanks
-Nagu
-Original Message-
From: Gary Lee [mailto:gary@dektech.com.au]
Sent: 16 April 2014 12:53
To: hans.fe...@ericsson.com; hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com; Nagendra Kumar
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PATCH 1 of 2] amfd: use job queue
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/imm.cc| 45 +++
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/imm.h | 16 +++
2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Currently, admin operation responses from amfd are not synchronised with
IMM changes that may be
My comment was wrong. In the BAD_HANDLE case avd_imm_reinit_bg() must
be triggered and this is how we do it now. My concern was if the admin
resp job should remain in the queue or be discarded in this particular
case.
/Hans
On 11 April 2014 09:14, Hans Feldt osafde...@gmail.com wrote:
Some
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/imm.cc| 40 ++-
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/imm.h | 16
2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Currently, admin operation responses from amfd are not synchronised with
IMM changes that may be
