Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] smfd: wait for node destination before command execution [#893]

2014-05-15 Thread Anders Widell
Ack with minor comment: there is no check for the return value from sleep(), so sleep time may be shortened if interrupted by a signal. Also, sleep() is an old function that according to man page may be implemented using SIGALRM, which means there is a risk of interference from other threads

Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfnd : avoid multiple clean up of comps during shutdown phase [#890]

2014-05-15 Thread Hans Feldt
Ack, Thanks, Hans -Original Message- From: praveen.malv...@oracle.com [mailto:praveen.malv...@oracle.com] Sent: den 12 maj 2014 17:13 To: Hans Feldt; nagendr...@oracle.com Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [PATCH 1 of 1] amfnd : avoid multiple clean up of comps during

[devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] v3 amfnd: Not all npi-components are restarted during SuRestart escalation [#885]

2014-05-15 Thread Minh Hon Chau
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/susm.cc | 16 +--- 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) In case of npi su restart recovery, the condition to change su presence state is not sufficient. If the component of the last csi in csi_list has been restarted first due to

[devel] [PATCH 0 of 1] Review Request for v3 amfnd: Not all npi-components are restarted during SuRestart escalation [#885]

2014-05-15 Thread Minh Hon Chau
Summary: v3 amfnd: Not all npi-components are restarted during SuRestart escalation [#885] Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 885 Peer Reviewer(s): Hans F, Hans N, Nagendra, Praveen Pull request to: Affected branch(es): default Development branch: default

Re: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 3] Review Request for imm: add support for configurable OI callback timeout [#16]

2014-05-15 Thread Neelakanta Reddy
Hi zoran, Following are the comments: 1. The patch is not compatible at upgrade. Eg: If one node having new release and other node having older release, then following is the errors: osafimmnd[15258]: ER Illegal IMMND message type:97 osafimmnd[15258]: ER Edu decode Failed osafimmnd[15258]: ER

Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] v3 amfnd: Not all npi-components are restarted during SuRestart escalation [#885]

2014-05-15 Thread praveen malviya
Ack. Thanks Praveen On 15-May-14 3:00 PM, Minh Hon Chau wrote: osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/susm.cc | 16 +--- 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) In case of npi su restart recovery, the condition to change su presence state is not sufficient. If the component

Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfd: allow change to saAmfSGNumPrefActiveSUs for N+M SG while UNLOCKED [#871]

2014-05-15 Thread Nagendra Kumar
Ok, keep a notice log. Ack. Thanks -Nagu -Original Message- From: Alex Jones [mailto:ajo...@genband.com] Sent: 13 May 2014 20:29 To: Nagendra Kumar; hans.fe...@ericsson.com; Praveen Malviya Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 1] amfd: allow change to

Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfd: allow change to saAmfSGNumPrefActiveSUs for N+M SG while UNLOCKED [#871]

2014-05-15 Thread Hans Feldt
if (value_is_deleted) sg-saAmfSGNumPrefActiveSUs = sg-saAmfSGNumPrefActiveSUs; shouldn't it reset the value from the SgType? Thanks, Hans -Original Message- From: Nagendra Kumar [mailto:nagendr...@oracle.com] Sent: den 15 maj 2014 13:56 To: Alex Jones; Hans Feldt; Praveen

Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfd: allow change to saAmfSGNumPrefActiveSUs for N+M SG while UNLOCKED [#871]

2014-05-15 Thread Nagendra Kumar
There is no value corresponding to it in sgtype. -Original Message- From: Hans Feldt [mailto:hans.fe...@ericsson.com] Sent: 15 May 2014 17:22 To: Nagendra Kumar; Alex Jones; Praveen Malviya Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [PATCH 1 of 1] amfd: allow change to

Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfd: Remove asserts from validation routines [#849]

2014-05-15 Thread Nagendra Kumar
Some comments inlined with Nagu Thanks -Nagu -Original Message- From: Gary Lee [mailto:gary@dektech.com.au] Sent: 08 May 2014 12:14 To: hans.fe...@ericsson.com; hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com; Nagendra Kumar; Praveen Malviya Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject:

Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfd: allow change to saAmfSGNumPrefActiveSUs for N+M SG while UNLOCKED [#871]

2014-05-15 Thread Hans Feldt
Yeah OK but the default is one(1). Should it be reverted to that or it so that we can't allow to decrease this value? /Hans -Original Message- From: Nagendra Kumar [mailto:nagendr...@oracle.com] Sent: den 15 maj 2014 14:00 To: Hans Feldt; Alex Jones; Praveen Malviya Cc:

Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfd: allow change to saAmfSGNumPrefActiveSUs for N+M SG while UNLOCKED [#871]

2014-05-15 Thread Hans Feldt
Ack, Thanks, Hans -Original Message- From: Alex Jones [mailto:ajo...@genband.com] Sent: den 12 maj 2014 21:06 To: Hans Feldt; nagendr...@oracle.com; praveen.malv...@oracle.com Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [PATCH 1 of 1] amfd: allow change to

[devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] smfd: campaign can be committed after cluster reboot in state completed [#906]

2014-05-15 Thread Ingvar Bergstrom
osaf/services/saf/smfsv/smfd/SmfUpgradeProcedure.cc | 10 +- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) Without this patch a cluster reboot in state execution completed will put the upgrade campaign in a fail state if the old unused versioned types are removed in the campaign

[devel] [PATCH 0 of 1] Review Request for SMF #906

2014-05-15 Thread Ingvar Bergstrom
Summary: smfd: campaign can be committed after cluster reboot in state completed Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 906 Peer Reviewer(s): Anders W Pull request to: Affected branch(es): 4.3.x, 4.4.x, default Development branch: default Impacted area Impact

[devel] [PATCH 0 of 1] Review Request for v4 amfnd: Not all npi-components are restarted during SuRestart escalation [#885]

2014-05-15 Thread Minh Hon Chau
Summary: v4 amfnd: Not all npi-components are restarted during SuRestart escalation [#885] Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 885 Peer Reviewer(s): Hans F, Hans N, Nagendra, Praveen Pull request to: Affected branch(es): default Development branch: default

Re: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 3] Review Request for imm: add support for configurable OI callback timeout [#16]

2014-05-15 Thread Zoran Milinkovic
Hi Neelakanta, Find my answers inline. Best regards, Zoran -Original Message- From: Neelakanta Reddy [mailto:reddy.neelaka...@oracle.com] Sent: den 15 maj 2014 11:49 To: Zoran Milinkovic Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 3] Review Request for imm: add

Re: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 3] Review Request for imm: add support for configurable OI callback timeout [#16]

2014-05-15 Thread Neelakanta Reddy
Hi zoran, comments inline. /Neel. On Thursday 15 May 2014 08:09 PM, Zoran Milinkovic wrote: Hi Neelakanta, Find my answers inline. Best regards, Zoran -Original Message- From: Neelakanta Reddy [mailto:reddy.neelaka...@oracle.com] Sent: den 15 maj 2014 11:49 To: Zoran