Summary: clm: make CLM tests independent of other CLM tests [#2520]
Review request for Ticket(s): 2520
Peer Reviewer(s): Anders, Praveen
Pull request to: Zoran
Affected branch(es): develop, release
Development branch: ticket-2520
Base revision: be6e036f1b3dc9582a6bc2013789fadc85e79aac
Personal repository: git://git.code.sf.net/u/zmilinkovic/review
--------------------------------
Impacted area Impact y/n
--------------------------------
Docs n
Build system n
RPM/packaging n
Configuration files n
Startup scripts n
SAF services n
OpenSAF services n
Core libraries n
Samples n
Tests y
Other n
Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
revision d8dac2a5783f8d8b5b4c0b5a4a008a1e5f2c0d55
Author: Zoran Milinkovic <zoran.milinko...@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 16:44:24 +0200
clm: make CLM tests independent of other CLM tests [#2520]
The patch removes dependencies between CLM tests. CLM tests can be run more
times now.
Duplicated CLM tests are removed from clmtest.
Complete diffstat:
------------------
src/clm/apitest/clmtest.c | 15 ++++
src/clm/apitest/tet_saClmClusterTrack.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
2 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
Testing Commands:
-----------------
Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
clmtest must pass all tests.
Each test manually executed more times must be successful.
Mostly tests from suite 7 are affected by this patch.
Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
Ack from Anders and Praveeen
Arch Built Started Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips n n
mips64 n n
x86 n n
x86_64 n n
powerpc n n
powerpc64 n n
Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]
Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):
___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
that need proper data filled in.
___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.
___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header
___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.
___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.
___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.
___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
(i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)
___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.
___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.
___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.
___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.
___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
too much content into a single commit.
___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)
___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.
___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.
___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
of what has changed between each re-send.
___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.
___ You have a misconfigured ~/.gitconfig file (i.e. user.name, user.email etc)
___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
the threaded patch review.
___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
for in-service upgradability test.
___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
