Summary: smfd: wait for node destination before command execution
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 893
Peer Reviewer(s): Anders W
Pull request to: 
Affected branch(es): default, 4.4, 4.3
Development branch: default

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            n
 OpenSAF services        y
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
smfd: wait for node destination before command execution

changeset 703b159dfc175644cac577fb58e392bfe9860231
Author: Ingvar Bergstrom <ingvar.bergst...@ericsson.com>
Date:   Fri, 09 May 2014 13:19:03 +0200

        smfd: wait for node destination before command execution [#893]

        smfd wait for the node destination to appear before any command 
specified in
        the campaign is executed. If the node destination does not appear 
within a
        timeout period the campaign will fail.


Complete diffstat:
------------------
 osaf/services/saf/smfsv/smfd/SmfUpgradeStep.cc |  58 
+++++++---------------------------------------------------
 osaf/services/saf/smfsv/smfd/SmfUpgradeStep.hh |   8 --------
 osaf/services/saf/smfsv/smfd/SmfUtils.cc       |  18 ++++++++++++++++++
 osaf/services/saf/smfsv/smfd/SmfUtils.hh       |   1 +
 4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
 


Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------


Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
 Will push after three days if no comments received.


Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      y          y
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to