[devel] [PATCH 0 of 1] Review Request for smf: failed one-step upgrade between opensaf versions [#2226]

2017-01-05 Thread Rafael Odzakow 
Summary: smf: failed one-step upgrade between opensaf versions [#2226]
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): #2226
Peer Reviewer(s): lennart/reddy
Pull request to: <>
Affected branch(es): <>
Development branch: <>


Impacted area   Impact y/n

 Docsn
 Build systemn
 RPM/packaging   n
 Configuration files n
 Startup scripts n
 SAF servicesn
 OpenSAF servicesy
 Core libraries  n
 Samples n
 Tests   n
 Other   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
-
 <>

changeset 5d8c95fef7ccc995f353f49c9db1b6771ceba194
Author: Rafael Odzakow 
Date:   Thu, 05 Jan 2017 13:34:07 +0100

smf: failed one-step upgrade between opensaf versions [#2226]


Complete diffstat:
--
 src/smf/smfd/SmfExecControlHdl.cc |  20 
 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-
 I did a reboot upgrade. Before the cluster rebooted I removed
"openSafSmfExecControl=SmfHdlCopy" with this change the campaign recreated the
copy after the reboot


Testing, Expected Results:
--
 <>


Conditions of Submission:
-
 <>


Arch  Built StartedLinux distro
---
mipsn  n
mips64  n  n
x86 n  n
x86_64  n  n
powerpc n  n
powerpc64   n  n


Reviewer Checklist:
---
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
(i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

[devel] [PATCH 0 of 1] Review Request for smf: failed one-step upgrade between opensaf versions [#2226]

2017-01-05 Thread Rafael Odzakow 
Summary: smf: failed one-step upgrade between opensaf versions [#2226]
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): #2226
Peer Reviewer(s): lennart/reddy
Pull request to: <>
Affected branch(es):
Development branch: <>


Impacted area   Impact y/n

 Docsn
 Build systemn
 RPM/packaging   n
 Configuration files n
 Startup scripts n
 SAF servicesn
 OpenSAF servicesy
 Core libraries  n
 Samples n
 Tests   n
 Other   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
-
 <>

changeset a0c0ea48b46d897826374d92e1a5a990d8e59e04
Author: Rafael Odzakow 
Date:   Thu, 05 Jan 2017 13:34:07 +0100

smf: failed one-step upgrade between opensaf versions [#2226]


Complete diffstat:
--
 src/smf/smfd/SmfExecControlHdl.cc |  17 -
 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-
 I did a reboot upgrade. Before the cluster rebooted I removed
 "openSafSmfExecControl=SmfHdlCopy" with this change the campaign recreated the
 copy after the reboot


Testing, Expected Results:
--
 <>


Conditions of Submission:
-
 <>


Arch  Built StartedLinux distro
---
mipsn  n
mips64  n  n
x86 n  n
x86_64  n  n
powerpc n  n
powerpc64   n  n


Reviewer Checklist:
---
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
(i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel