Summary: ckpt: ckpttest for long dn is failing #2032 Review request for Trac Ticket(s): #2032 Peer Reviewer(s): mahesh.va...@oracle.com; anders.wid...@ericsson.com Pull request to: mahesh.va...@oracle.com Affected branch(es): default Development branch: default
-------------------------------- Impacted area Impact y/n -------------------------------- Docs n Build system n RPM/packaging n Configuration files n Startup scripts n SAF services n OpenSAF services n Core libraries n Samples n Tests y Other n Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above): --------------------------------------------- changeset 0a8d025d3bbdcaa9e752b8a8f1d7c605787701b7 Author: Hoang Vo <hoang.m...@dektech.com.au> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:08:31 +0700 [mq]: 2032_fix_ckpttest.patch Complete diffstat: ------------------ tests/cpsv/test_cpa.c | 2 +- tests/cpsv/test_cpa_util.c | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Testing Commands: ----------------- Enable long DN: immcfg -a longDnsAllowed=1 opensafImm=opensafImm,safApp=safImmService export SA_ENABLE_EXTENDED_NAMES=1 RUn test ckpttest Testing, Expected Results: -------------------------- All test cases must passed Conditions of Submission: ------------------------- ACK from maintainer Arch Built Started Linux distro ------------------------------------------- mips n n mips64 n n x86 n n x86_64 y y powerpc n n powerpc64 n n Reviewer Checklist: ------------------- [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!] Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries): ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries that need proper data filled in. ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push. ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable. ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text. ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits. ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc) ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests. Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing. ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed. ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs. ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits. ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is too much content into a single commit. ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc) ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent; Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled. ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded commits, or place in a public tree for a pull. ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication of what has changed between each re-send. ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review. ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc) ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the the threaded patch review. ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results for in-service upgradability test. ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel