Summary: log: fix ER no stream exists in syslog [#2043] Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 2043 Peer Reviewer(s): Lennart, Mahesh Pull request to: <<LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE>> Affected branch(es): 5.1, default Development branch: default
-------------------------------- Impacted area Impact y/n -------------------------------- Docs n Build system n RPM/packaging n Configuration files n Startup scripts n SAF services y OpenSAF services n Core libraries n Samples n Tests n Other n Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above): --------------------------------------------- <<EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE>> changeset 36beec718021c952420c1a8c059e5dc460d57a75 Author: Vu Minh Nguyen <vu.m.ngu...@dektech.com.au> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 14:15:58 +0700 log: fix ER no stream exists in syslog [#2043] The `number of streams` refers to total existing log streams in cluster. And `stream_array` is the database holding all existing log streams. When interating all log streams, logsv first started at the index `number of streams`, if getting NULL, logsv considered that case as `no stream`. This is absolutely wrong. This patch provides other way to iterate all log streams. Complete diffstat: ------------------ osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_amf.cc | 29 +++++++++++++++-------------- osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_config.cc | 10 ++++------ osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_evt.cc | 27 +++++++++++++++------------ osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_imm.cc | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------ osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_mbcsv.cc | 19 ++++++++----------- osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_stream.cc | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_stream.h | 2 +- 7 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-) Testing Commands: ----------------- <<LIST THE COMMAND LINE TOOLS/STEPS TO TEST YOUR CHANGES>> Testing, Expected Results: -------------------------- <<PASTE COMMAND OUTPUTS / TEST RESULTS>> Conditions of Submission: ------------------------- <<HOW MANY DAYS BEFORE PUSHING, CONSENSUS ETC>> Arch Built Started Linux distro ------------------------------------------- mips n n mips64 n n x86 n n x86_64 n n powerpc n n powerpc64 n n Reviewer Checklist: ------------------- [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!] Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries): ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries that need proper data filled in. ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push. ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable. ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text. ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits. ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc) ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests. Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing. ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed. ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs. ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits. ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is too much content into a single commit. ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc) ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent; Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled. ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded commits, or place in a public tree for a pull. ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication of what has changed between each re-send. ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review. ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc) ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the the threaded patch review. ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results for in-service upgradability test. ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel