Summary: dtm: Use inotify to improve response time for transport monitor 
process V2
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): #2091
Peer Reviewer(s): AndersW, Ramesh, Mahesh
Pull request to: 
Affected branch(es): default
Development branch: default

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            y
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
 <<EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE>>

changeset 2f85debd10eded8915891dc0828aa9023906fa08
Author: Hans Nordeback <hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:57:37 +0200

        base: Use inotify to improve response time for transport monitor 
process V2
        [#2091]

changeset b6cb14833942f172d906306821ed5126d040106c
Author: Hans Nordeback <hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:58:47 +0200

        base: Unit tests for FileNotify V2 [#2091]

changeset 8b98870328dc5966f1ac9bf45f3420d576a7b54b
Author: Hans Nordeback <hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 Oct 2016 18:12:08 +0200

        dtm: Use inotify to improve response time for transport monitor process 
V2
        [#2091]


Added Files:
------------
 osaf/libs/core/cplusplus/base/file_notify.cc
 osaf/libs/core/cplusplus/base/file_notify.h
 osaf/libs/core/cplusplus/base/tests/file_notify_test.cc


Complete diffstat:
------------------
 osaf/libs/core/cplusplus/base/Makefile.am               |    2 +
 osaf/libs/core/cplusplus/base/file_notify.cc            |  175 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 osaf/libs/core/cplusplus/base/file_notify.h             |   87 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 osaf/libs/core/cplusplus/base/tests/Makefile.am         |    7 +-
 osaf/libs/core/cplusplus/base/tests/file_notify_test.cc |   83 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 352 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
 <<LIST THE COMMAND LINE TOOLS/STEPS TO TEST YOUR CHANGES>>


Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
 <<PASTE COMMAND OUTPUTS / TEST RESULTS>>


Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
 <<HOW MANY DAYS BEFORE PUSHING, CONSENSUS ETC>>


Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      y          y
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to