Re: [devel] [PATCH 1/1] plmd: enable dynamic tracing [#2796]

2018-03-08 Thread Ravi Sekhar Reddy Konda
Hi Alex, I think that is enough, I am fine as long as user has option to use the routine for debugging Thanks, Ravi From: Jones, Alex [mailto:ajo...@rbbn.com] Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2018 6:00 PM To: Ravi Sekhar Reddy Konda Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PA

Re: [devel] [PATCH 1/1] plmd: enable dynamic tracing [#2796]

2018-03-08 Thread Jones, Alex
Hi Ravi, Some of the other subsystems like MSG and LCK have the same issue, and there is no private USR2 code in them. I have had good success attaching gdb to the process and calling the dump routine from there. Then the user does not have to recompile. Do you feel that is enough? Ale

Re: [devel] [PATCH 1/1] plmd: enable dynamic tracing [#2796]

2018-03-07 Thread Ravi Sekhar Reddy Konda
Hi Alex, Ack for the patch, but have one comment I understand using SIGUSR2 for Control Block dumping is not the generic way as we are using USR2 signal for dynamically enabling Traces. we added this because at times Traces are not enough for debugging and dump routine dumps the complete Con