Ok,
ACK.
-AVM
On 10/12/2016 12:27 PM, Vu Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Mahesh,
>
> In README file, there is a note on this. Refer to "Note on memory handling
> for writting log record"
>
> And caller here means the one that call the function `log_stream_write_h`,
> not log client.
>
> Regards, Vu
>
Hi Mahesh,
In README file, there is a note on this. Refer to "Note on memory handling
for writting log record"
And caller here means the one that call the function `log_stream_write_h`,
not log client.
Regards, Vu
> -Original Message-
> From: A V Mahesh [mailto:mahesh.va...@oracle.com]
Hi Vu,
`Return (-1) to inform that it is caller's responsibility to free the
allocated mem` is this existing practices for application ?
or new , if new do we need to document it .
-AVM
On 10/12/2016 10:14 AM, A V Mahesh wrote:
> ACK
>
> -AVM
>
>
> On 9/13/2016 4:19 PM, Vu Minh Nguyen wrote:
ACK
-AVM
On 9/13/2016 4:19 PM, Vu Minh Nguyen wrote:
> osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_filehdl.cc | 16 +++-
> osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_stream.cc | 6 ++
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
>
> logsv did pass the WRITE request to file handle
Yes. That wrong review request is for #1986. It was pushed.
Quoting Lennart Lund :
> Ack
>
> Note: There seems to be another review request tagged with the same
> ticket number?
>
> Thanks
> Lennart
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Vu Minh Nguyen
Ack
Note: There seems to be another review request tagged with the same ticket
number?
Thanks
Lennart
> -Original Message-
> From: Vu Minh Nguyen [mailto:vu.m.ngu...@dektech.com.au]
> Sent: den 13 september 2016 12:50
> To: Lennart Lund ;