- **status**: review --> fixed
- **Comment**:
changeset: 6697:2c31c871f702
branch: opensaf-4.5.x
parent: 6694:9e9ed7642bc8
user:Alex Jones
date:Fri Jul 24 15:46:34 2015 +0530
summary: amfd: fix N+M identification of standby SU at controller failover
[#1414]
chang
- Description has changed:
Diff:
--- old
+++ new
@@ -8,4 +8,4 @@
4) Node 1 has active controller, active 2N assignment, and active N+1
assignment
5) Node 2 has standby controller, standby 2N assignment, and 5 N+M standby
assignments
-If I hard reset node 1, its active N+1 SI gets assi
Oops. That was missing a word! Here's another try.
If I hard reset node 1, its active N+1 SI gets assigned standby to another SU
that already has an active assignment, which is illegal.
---
** [tickets:#1414] amfd: N+M wrong assigment with SI dependency and role
failure**
**Status:** review
- **Milestone**: future --> 4.5.2
---
** [tickets:#1414] amfd: N+M wrong assigment with SI dependency and role
failure**
**Status:** review
**Milestone:** 4.5.2
**Created:** Mon Jul 13, 2015 05:32 PM UTC by Alex Jones
**Last Updated:** Wed Jul 15, 2015 09:04 AM UTC
**Owner:** Alex Jones
Give
Can you please explain bit more: "active N+1 SI gets assigned to another SU
that already has an active assignment, which is illegal."
Thanks
-Nagu
---
** [tickets:#1414] amfd: N+M wrong assigment with SI dependency and role
failure**
**Status:** review
**Milestone:** future
**Created:** Mon
- **status**: assigned --> review
---
** [tickets:#1414] amfd: N+M wrong assigment with SI dependency and role
failure**
**Status:** review
**Milestone:** future
**Created:** Mon Jul 13, 2015 05:32 PM UTC by Alex Jones
**Last Updated:** Mon Jul 13, 2015 05:32 PM UTC
**Owner:** Alex Jones
Giv
---
** [tickets:#1414] amfd: N+M wrong assigment with SI dependency and role
failure**
**Status:** assigned
**Milestone:** future
**Created:** Mon Jul 13, 2015 05:32 PM UTC by Alex Jones
**Last Updated:** Mon Jul 13, 2015 05:32 PM UTC
**Owner:** Alex Jones
Given the following setup:
6 nodes
