There's a typo in this V2, please apply the below change when testing it
diff --git a/osaf/services/saf/amf/config/amf_classes.xml
b/osaf/services/saf/amf/config/amf_classes.xml
--- a/osaf/services/saf/amf/config/amf_classes.xml
+++ b/osaf/services/saf/amf/config/amf_classes.xml
@@ -328,7 +328,7
Please note that there're some test cases failing without #1725 part 1
---
** [tickets:#1725] AMF: Recover transient SUSIs left over from headless**
**Status:** review
**Milestone:** 5.1.FC
**Created:** Wed Apr 06, 2016 07:16 AM UTC by Minh Hon Chau
**Last Updated:** Thu Aug 04, 2016 01:00 PM
Yep, I will do
---
** [tickets:#1725] AMF: Recover transient SUSIs left over from headless**
**Status:** accepted
**Milestone:** 5.1.FC
**Created:** Wed Apr 06, 2016 07:16 AM UTC by Minh Hon Chau
**Last Updated:** Thu Jul 28, 2016 07:04 AM UTC
**Owner:** Minh Hon Chau
This ticket is more
Yes you are right. I will follow this order when sending the patches for review.
---
** [tickets:#1725] AMF: Recover transient SUSIs left over from headless**
**Status:** accepted
**Milestone:** 5.1.FC
**Created:** Wed Apr 06, 2016 07:16 AM UTC by Minh Hon Chau
**Last Updated:** Thu Jul 28,
I think #1 #2 #3 #4 should be included in the scope of #1725, it helps to have
a global view on solution for all cases. The actual implementation could not
fully complete in this 5.1 but at least AMF should be agreed on the way it
recovers for all cases after headless. Doing #4 after all may
