Question: How can this case happen for the 1PBE case when there is only one
user thread using the sqlite instance ?
Another relevant question is why/when do you observe this now ?
The test case or test setup must be special somehow.
With only one thread this case should be impossible.
It
I looked at the code and the error message is correct but the "lock" is the PBE
"spin lock" created
for handling 2PBE. The fact that it finds it locked in 1PBE means there is a
logical bug somewhere
in 1PBE.
Most likely some error case where there is a bailout from commit processing
without
- **summary**: imm: abort the 1PBE when pbeBeginTrans sees db as locked -->
imm: exit the 1PBE when pbeBeginTrans sees db as locked
- **status**: accepted --> review
---
** [tickets:#1526] imm: exit the 1PBE when pbeBeginTrans sees db as locked**
**Status:** review
**Milestone:** 4.5.2
- **Milestone**: 4.7.RC1 --> future
---
** [tickets:#1529] Opensaf cluster went for reset wihle invoking failover**
**Status:** unassigned
**Milestone:** future
**Created:** Thu Oct 08, 2015 07:53 AM UTC by Chani Srivastava
**Last Updated:** Thu Oct 08, 2015 07:53 AM UTC
**Owner:** nobody
I guess it could be that the pbe level message "Sqlite db locked by other
thread" is plain wrong,
i.e. missleading.
---
** [tickets:#1526] imm: exit the 1PBE when pbeBeginTrans sees db as locked**
**Status:** review
**Milestone:** 4.5.2
**Created:** Wed Oct 07, 2015 09:43 AM UTC by
---
** [tickets:#1529] Opensaf cluster went for reset wihle invoking failover**
**Status:** unassigned
**Milestone:** 4.7.RC1
**Created:** Thu Oct 08, 2015 07:53 AM UTC by Chani Srivastava
**Last Updated:** Thu Oct 08, 2015 07:53 AM UTC
**Owner:** nobody
**Attachments:**
-
- **summary**: imm: exit the 1PBE when pbeBeginTrans sees db as locked -->
imm: 1PBE can see db as locked
- **Comment**:
Changed ticket slogan to describe the problem.
---
** [tickets:#1526] imm: 1PBE can see db as locked**
**Status:** review
**Milestone:** 4.5.2
**Created:** Wed Oct 07,
- **Comment**:
Also, it is better to use PRIx64 while printing MDS addresses. The output will
be more readable, i guess.
---
** [tickets:#1519] log: The log notice message should be informative**
**Status:** unassigned
**Milestone:** 5.0
**Created:** Tue Oct 06, 2015 09:18 AM UTC by
- **Milestone**: 4.5.2 --> 4.7.RC1
---
** [tickets:#1518] AMF: SU presence state transition is not correct during
admin op restart**
**Status:** unassigned
**Milestone:** 4.7.RC1
**Created:** Tue Oct 06, 2015 07:41 AM UTC by Quyen Dao
**Last Updated:** Thu Oct 08, 2015 10:16 AM UTC
- **Milestone**: 4.5.2 --> 4.7.RC1
---
** [tickets:#1517] AMF : si-si deps not followed during SU restart**
**Status:** unassigned
**Milestone:** 4.7.RC1
**Created:** Tue Oct 06, 2015 06:55 AM UTC by Srikanth R
**Last Updated:** Tue Oct 06, 2015 07:12 AM UTC
**Owner:** nobody
Changeset :
---
** [tickets:#1531] LOG: Improve handling of OI implementer create and restore**
**Status:** assigned
**Milestone:** 5.0
**Created:** Thu Oct 08, 2015 11:14 AM UTC by elunlen
**Last Updated:** Thu Oct 08, 2015 11:14 AM UTC
**Owner:** elunlen
Setting up IMM Object Implementer (OI) is not
On page 74 for Prescence state of Component spec says, when a restartable
component is instantiated, it will move from restarting to Instantiated state.
Thus for a restartable SU, when last comp is started terminating, SU will move
to RESTARTING state. At this point of time all the component
Configuration to create AMF application is attached
Attachments:
-
[1530_twon.sh](https://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/tickets/_discuss/thread/022eb6bb/24a1/attachment/1530_twon.sh)
(9.7 kB; application/x-shellscript)
---
** [tickets:#1530] AMF : TwoN, SU struck in terminating during sponsor
---
** [tickets:#1530] AMF : TwoN, SU struck in terminating during sponsor si lock
( csi quiescd timeout)**
**Status:** unassigned
**Milestone:** 4.5.2
**Created:** Thu Oct 08, 2015 09:52 AM UTC by Srikanth R
**Last Updated:** Thu Oct 08, 2015 09:52 AM UTC
**Owner:** nobody
Changeset :
It also looks like there is a superfluous "x" character printed after the MDS
destination. The "x" character after PRIu64 should be removed:
LOG_NO("Send of WRITE ack to %"PRIu64"x FAILED: %u", mds_dest, rc);
---
** [tickets:#1519] log: The log notice message should be
Will fix [#585]
---
** [tickets:#1531] LOG: Improve handling of OI implementer create and restore**
**Status:** assigned
**Milestone:** 5.0
**Created:** Thu Oct 08, 2015 11:14 AM UTC by elunlen
**Last Updated:** Thu Oct 08, 2015 11:14 AM UTC
**Owner:** elunlen
Setting up IMM Object
- **Milestone**: 4.5.2 --> 4.7.RC1
---
** [tickets:#1516] AMF : si-swap operation in nway should honor
saAmfSGMaxStandbySIsperSU **
**Status:** unassigned
**Milestone:** 4.7.RC1
**Created:** Mon Oct 05, 2015 12:59 PM UTC by Srikanth R
**Last Updated:** Wed Oct 07, 2015 04:29 AM UTC
---
** [tickets:#1532] AMF : SI is in assigned state, after shutdown operation of
SI ( quiescing reject scenario)**
**Status:** unassigned
**Milestone:** 4.5.2
**Created:** Thu Oct 08, 2015 11:20 AM UTC by Srikanth R
**Last Updated:** Thu Oct 08, 2015 11:20 AM UTC
**Owner:** nobody
- **Type**: enhancement --> defect
---
** [tickets:#1420] log: crashed when performing admin op on configurable obj
class**
**Status:** review
**Milestone:** 4.5.2
**Created:** Thu Jul 16, 2015 09:28 AM UTC by Vu Minh Nguyen
**Last Updated:** Tue Sep 29, 2015 07:56 AM UTC
**Owner:** Vu Minh
- **status**: review --> fixed
- **assigned_to**: Vu Minh Nguyen --> nobody
- **Comment**:
changeset: 6985:f9f8e549f071
tag: tip
parent: 6980:f133f1195bc2
user:Vu Minh Nguyen
date:Thu Oct 08 15:46:12 2015 +0200
summary: log:
The problem doesn't happen on the latest changeset.
According to the log, the problem happened because the ckpt_lcl_ref_cnt was
still 1 after the application on PL4 finalized
Jul 17 17:18:07.958259 osafckptnd [13885:cpnd_evt.c:0540] T1 cpnd client ckpt
close success
21 matches
Mail list logo