[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #2134 AMF: Update RTA saAmfSISUHAState to IMM

2016-12-14 Thread Minh Hon Chau
Attach documentation regarding the attr saAmfSISUHaState Attachments: - [OpenSAF_AMF_PR_2134.odt](https://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/tickets/_discuss/thread/104962dd/cf00/attachment/OpenSAF_AMF_PR_2134.odt) (130.6 kB; application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text) --- ** [tickets:#2134] AMF:

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #2134 AMF: Update RTA saAmfSISUHAState to IMM

2016-12-12 Thread Praveen
Hi Minh, I think we cannot use "not supported". Instead we should use the word not recommended. Suppose SG is in transition state because of assignments going on, if a user makes some query at this time then user will surely get some value of attribute but this value will be changing with each

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #2134 AMF: Update RTA saAmfSISUHAState to IMM

2016-12-12 Thread Minh Hon Chau
Hi Praveen, Although part 2 #1725 is pushed, there is a chance that both avd_sg_su_si_mod_snd() and avd_susi_mod_send() are updating this attribute differently. To avoid backward incompatibility in future, I would like to document that reading saAmfSISUState while assignment is ongoing not

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #2134 AMF: Update RTA saAmfSISUHAState to IMM

2016-11-23 Thread Praveen
- **Milestone**: 5.2.FC --> never --- ** [tickets:#2134] AMF: Update RTA saAmfSISUHAState to IMM** **Status:** wontfix **Milestone:** never **Created:** Thu Oct 20, 2016 07:58 PM UTC by Minh Hon Chau **Last Updated:** Thu Nov 10, 2016 06:48 AM UTC **Owner:** nobody In scenario of 2N

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #2134 AMF: Update RTA saAmfSISUHAState to IMM

2016-11-09 Thread Minh Hon Chau
- **status**: unassigned --> wontfix --- ** [tickets:#2134] AMF: Update RTA saAmfSISUHAState to IMM** **Status:** wontfix **Milestone:** 5.2.FC **Created:** Thu Oct 20, 2016 07:58 PM UTC by Minh Hon Chau **Last Updated:** Thu Nov 10, 2016 06:47 AM UTC **Owner:** nobody In scenario of 2N

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #2134 AMF: Update RTA saAmfSISUHAState to IMM

2016-11-09 Thread Minh Hon Chau
Hi Praveen, I have updated #2133, #1354. Since part 2 of #1725 has been pushed, so I close this ticket. There is a very small probability that application may still require this attribute updated after assignment sequence as before, this drops into the case of avd_sg_su_si_mod_snd() . But

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #2134 AMF: Update RTA saAmfSISUHAState to IMM

2016-11-09 Thread Praveen
Hi MInh, Any update on this. Thanks, Praveen --- ** [tickets:#2134] AMF: Update RTA saAmfSISUHAState to IMM** **Status:** unassigned **Milestone:** 5.2.FC **Created:** Thu Oct 20, 2016 07:58 PM UTC by Minh Hon Chau **Last Updated:** Wed Nov 09, 2016 06:52 AM UTC **Owner:** nobody In

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #2134 AMF: Update RTA saAmfSISUHAState to IMM

2016-11-08 Thread Praveen
Hi Minh, What I get is : With part 2 of #1725, updation to IMM becomes consistent in the existing manner. If this is the case, I agree to close this ticket. In that case please update #1354 and #2133 with this ticket link so that discussion can be recolleted in future. Thanks, Praveen ---

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #2134 AMF: Update RTA saAmfSISUHAState to IMM

2016-11-08 Thread Minh Hon Chau
Hi Praveen, Agree that if the *Curr* related attributes consider fsm state in rt_attr_cb(), then it would be suitable for reflecting the current status of assignment, which is required by user of #1354 The part 2 of #1725 has been pushed, that contains a change to update saAmfSISUHaState to

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #2134 AMF: Update RTA saAmfSISUHAState to IMM

2016-11-07 Thread Praveen
Hi Minh, si_rt_attr_cb() is invoked in AMFD context. So I think, this function can take into account fsm state to count only AVD_SU_SI_STATE_ASGND for updating saAmfSINumCurrActiveAssignments and saAmfSINumCurrStandbyAssignments. For quiescing state, when AMFND gets Response() from component

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #2134 AMF: Update RTA saAmfSISUHAState to IMM

2016-10-24 Thread Minh Hon Chau
Hi Praveen, As I see the code inside si_rt_attr_cb() updates saAmfSINumCurrActiveAssignments and saAmfSINumCurrStandbyAssignments to IMM without any check of fsm state, or maybe I am wrong? If we do update new saAmfHAState after AMFD receives assignment response from AMFND, in case of

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #2134 AMF: Update RTA saAmfSISUHAState to IMM

2016-10-24 Thread Praveen
Hi Minh, Ticket #1870 was realated counters in SI and SU. Before #1870, counters were updated for all HA states in all red models without any definite rule. Because of this good number of issues related to AMFD crashes were reported. Ticket #1870 was for updatig counters uniformly in all the

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #2134 AMF: Update RTA saAmfSISUHAState to IMM

2016-10-23 Thread Minh Hon Chau
Hi Praveen, I have found a commit that updates saAmfSISUHAState right after sending su_si assignment in function avd_susi_mod_send, which is: changeset: 3016:8f4d14ab88e4 summary: AVSv:Updating susi assignment countrs at the time of role sending #1870 I think this commit was meant to

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #2134 AMF: Update RTA saAmfSISUHAState to IMM

2016-10-21 Thread Praveen
Hi Minh, Ticket #1354 is based on a user list complaint. This ticket is related to states and runtime objects. Other ticket #1306 is related to notification that AMFD seds but talks almost similar problem from notification perspective. I think we can do something like this: 1)For fresh

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #2134 AMF: Update RTA saAmfSISUHAState to IMM

2016-10-20 Thread Minh Hon Chau
--- ** [tickets:#2134] AMF: Update RTA saAmfSISUHAState to IMM** **Status:** unassigned **Milestone:** 5.2.FC **Created:** Thu Oct 20, 2016 07:58 PM UTC by Minh Hon Chau **Last Updated:** Thu Oct 20, 2016 07:58 PM UTC **Owner:** nobody In scenario of 2N Si-swap, when AMFD sends QUIESCED