On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:50:00AM +0200, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 2. Mai 2006 15:41 schrieb Wouter Verhelst:
> > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 02:34:08PM +0200, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> > > recompiles openct, opensc and openssh (with opensc support)
> > > at
> > > http://www.opens
Am Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2006 09:18 schrieb Nils Larsch:
> committed to the head (will commit it to the stable branch later).
0.11.0 is already release, please no changes to that branch.
so currently we only have trunk for new changes. but I'd like
to create 0.11.1 real soon. maybe rc this weekend and
> afaik we agreed that we should set lock_login per default to false
> however it looks like nobody committed this change so far ...
ah. I only saw the config file was changed, but didn't check if some
in code default needs to be changed as well.
please change / commit into trunk so we get this r
Hi Douglas,
thanks for the code, commited to trunk.
but opensc 0.11.0 is already released, so it is too late for that.
but I hope for a 0.11.1 this month, preferable in the middle.
if you want, I can create a 0.11.1-rc1 right away.
Regards, Andreas
___
Am Dienstag, 2. Mai 2006 15:41 schrieb Wouter Verhelst:
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 02:34:08PM +0200, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> > recompiles openct, opensc and openssh (with opensc support)
> > at
> > http://www.opensc-project.org/ubuntu/
> >
> > no idea if that works in apt.conf, I don't know
Jean-Pierre Szikora wrote:
Hi,
Is the default lock_login really set to 'false' in OpenSC 0.11.0 as I
can read in opensc.conf? During my testing before releasing a new
experimental SCA release, I need to explicitely set 'lock_login =
false;' to get the right behaviour.
afaik we agreed that w
Chaskiel M Grundman wrote:
starcos_process_acl, called by starcos_create_file has a small bug. It
uses the wrong field in the sc_file_t to decide what the EF structure
is. ( found while debugging the one-shot tool I wrote to finish
initializing my ITSEC-P token)
committed to the head (will co
