Hi!
> >>> The smart cards I worked with, that used SM implemented more or less
> >>> what is defined in ISO 7816. The Wiki states, that GlobalPlatform SCP01
> >>> uses a different SM protocol. What exactly does differ from ISO 7816?
> >> keyset format; session key derivation data; session keys cal
On 3/28/2011 7:06 AM, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
> Le 25/03/2011 20:51, Douglas E. Engert a écrit :
>>
>>
>> On 3/25/2011 1:25 PM, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
>>> Le 25/03/2011 17:23, Douglas E. Engert a écrit :
Testing opensc-cardmod.dll r5270 on Vista, login to AD works with
two different cards
Le 25/03/2011 20:51, Douglas E. Engert a écrit :
>
>
> On 3/25/2011 1:25 PM, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
>> Le 25/03/2011 17:23, Douglas E. Engert a écrit :
>>> Testing opensc-cardmod.dll r5270 on Vista, login to AD works with
>>> two different cards to the same account. But certutil has a problem.
>>> I
Le 27/03/2011 18:50, Frank Morgner a écrit :
> On Sunday, March 27 at 10:23AM, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
>> Le 25/03/2011 23:07, Frank Morgner a écrit :
>>> The smart cards I worked with, that used SM implemented more or less
>>> what is defined in ISO 7816. The Wiki states, that GlobalPlatform SCP01
>
Le 27/03/2011 19:25, Frank Morgner a écrit :
> On Sunday, March 27 at 01:42PM, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
>>> http://www.opensc-project.org/opensc/wiki/SecureMessaging
>> I've added my vision onto the SM implementation .
>> Still to be finalized the proposal for the SM data types.
>> I'll try to look ov
>On Sunday, March 27 at 01:42PM, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
>> > http://www.opensc-project.org/opensc/wiki/SecureMessaging
>>
>> I've added my vision onto the SM implementation .
>> Still to be finalized the proposal for the SM data types.
>> I'll try to look over the prior works to see how their need
