[ ... ]
> Going for log4c or similar would IMHO be a total overkill,
> as is implementing anything internal that is designed for RFU.
> Focus should be on things related to smart cards, not logging :)
> If you want debug logging, too much is better than too little
> (you can always use grep). Und
On 04.01.2011 11:35, Martin Paljak wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2011, at 12:22 PM, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
>> My humble intention is to have the possibility to reduce the 'header' of the
>> every debug message call in the source code,
>> that actually, for my personal taste, is too large.
> Same here. I would
Hello,
On Jan 4, 2011, at 12:22 PM, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
> There has been more then one wide discussion about log system in OpenSC ,
> and I would not like to start the new one.
Agreed.
> My humble intention is to have the possibility to reduce the 'header' of the
> every debug message call in
Hello,
This has been discussed before, see the thread from March 2010 [1] and possibly
earlier threads.
On Jan 4, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Juan Antonio Martinez wrote:
> El lun, 03-01-2011 a las 13:01 +0100, Viktor TARASOV escribió:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I propose to introduce the following short form to in
On 04.01.2011 10:58, Juan Antonio Martinez wrote:
> El lun, 03-01-2011 a las 13:01 +0100, Viktor TARASOV escribió:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I propose to introduce the following short form to insert debug messages of
>> the 'normal' level.
>> Any objections?
> Fine, but thinks that we need a way to get finer d
El lun, 03-01-2011 a las 13:01 +0100, Viktor TARASOV escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I propose to introduce the following short form to insert debug messages of
> the 'normal' level.
> Any objections?
Fine, but thinks that we need a way to get finer debug tuning:
Not sure... perhaps it's time for introduct
Hi,
I propose to introduce the following short form to insert debug messages of the
'normal' level.
Any objections?
Kind wishes,
Viktor.
Index: src/libopensc/log.c
===
--- src/libopensc/log.c (révision 5031)
+++ src/libopensc/log.
