Re: [opensc-devel] Some MSVC build issues

2008-04-17 Thread Peter Stuge
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 07:55:24PM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > I see the script, its a start, but I though NSIS was the direction? > > Sure! > But I find nobody who wish to help. And I won't maintain this... I am interested in NSIS but I don't have the time. :( //Peter _

Re: [opensc-devel] Some MSVC build issues

2008-04-17 Thread Peter Stuge
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:23:34AM -0500, Douglas E. Engert wrote: > OK, I am willing to try and build with a cross compile using mingw > as that appears to be the consensus of opensc-project members. MinGW can also be used to build on Windows. It isn't a requirement to actually _cross_ compile, a

Re: [opensc-devel] Some MSVC build issues

2008-04-16 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 4/16/08, Douglas E. Engert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, I am willing to try and build with a cross compile using mingw > as that appears to be the consensus of opensc-project members. Great! > I have an Ubuntu system with the mingw32, mingw32-binutils, and > mingw-runtime. Good to test

Re: [opensc-devel] Some MSVC build issues

2008-04-16 Thread Douglas E. Engert
Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On 4/9/08, Douglas E. Engert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> As I said before, if you can create an installable SCB from ming, that >> can work on XP and Vista with OpenSSL and zip, that can work for login >> and browsers, then the MSVC build could be dropped. >> >> Until

Re: [opensc-devel] Some MSVC build issues

2008-04-14 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 4/9/08, Douglas E. Engert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As I said before, if you can create an installable SCB from ming, that > can work on XP and Vista with OpenSSL and zip, that can work for login > and browsers, then the MSVC build could be dropped. > > Until then, it would be a good idea

Re: [opensc-devel] Some MSVC build issues

2008-04-08 Thread Douglas E. Engert
Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > Any chance to set something like: > > LIBS = It could be done. I was trying to change as little as possible. > > So that the Make.rules.mak will perform .exe compilation and you remove all > .c.exe rule from all Makefile.mak. The Make.rules.mak needs work. It is a comb

Re: [opensc-devel] Some MSVC build issues

2008-04-08 Thread Douglas E. Engert
Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > Hi! > > 1. Why is there a separate netkey-tool.exe rule at ./src/tools/Makefile.mak? Don't know. That was the way it was in 0.11.4. The only differecne is it does not include util.obj > > 2. The def file should be generated using its own rule... > The library names do

Re: [opensc-devel] Some MSVC build issues

2008-04-08 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Any chance to set something like: LIBS = So that the Make.rules.mak will perform .exe compilation and you remove all .c.exe rule from all Makefile.mak. On 4/8/08, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > 1. Why is there a separate netkey-tool.exe rule at ./src/tools/Makefile.mak? > >

[opensc-devel] Some MSVC build issues

2008-04-08 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Hi! 1. Why is there a separate netkey-tool.exe rule at ./src/tools/Makefile.mak? 2. The def file should be generated using its own rule... xxx.def: xxx.exports echo LIBRARY $* > $*.def echo EXPORTS >> $*.def type $*.exports >> $*.def xxx.exe: xxx.def 3. At ./sr