2012/12/10 :
> Hello,
>
> Here is my patch (actually, 2 patches that depend if the patch concerns only
> the error 2328 (patch 1) or the whole block processing the return value of
> verify_certificate() (patch 2)).
Patch 2 applied in git
https://github.com/OpenSC/pam_pkcs11/commit/75613e32dfc49
frederic.comb...@cea.fr wrote:
> Here is my patch (actually, 2 patches that depend if the patch
> concerns only the error 2328 (patch 1) or the whole block
> processing the return value of verify_certificate() (patch 2)).
Patch 1 is obviously incorrect because your change is inside a
conditional.
d'origine-
De : Ludovic Rousseau [mailto:ludovic.rouss...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : lundi 10 décembre 2012 13:49
À : COMBEAU Frederic 150138
Cc : opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
Objet : Re: [opensc-devel] pam_pkcs11 with many certificates on a single token
2012/12/10 :
> Hello,
Hel
2012/12/10 :
> Hello,
Hello,
> I use pam_pkcs11 0.6.8 with libcurl but without nss. My tokens works fine but
> they can contain 4 or 5 certificates (with corresponding rsa keys).
>
> My certificates are not all from the same PKI, so they are not certified by
> the same ACs.
>
> The problem I e
Hello,
I use pam_pkcs11 0.6.8 with libcurl but without nss. My tokens works fine but
they can contain 4 or 5 certificates (with corresponding rsa keys).
My certificates are not all from the same PKI, so they are not certified by the
same ACs.
The problem I encounter with pam_pkcs11 is that if
2011/3/21 Dominik Fischer :
>
>
> Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:
>
>> Von: "Dominik Fischer"
>> Datum: 21. März 2011 15:43:02 MEZ
>> An: "Ludovic Rousseau"
>> Betreff: Re: [opensc-devel] [pam_pkcs11] improved error messages
>>
&
Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:
> Von: "Dominik Fischer"
> Datum: 21. März 2011 15:43:02 MEZ
> An: "Ludovic Rousseau"
> Betreff: Re: [opensc-devel] [pam_pkcs11] improved error messages
>
>
>>>>> (I'm not sure if the mailing
Hello,
Mailing list should eat attachments just fine (50KB limit IIRC)
On Mar 20, 2011, at 8:00 PM, Dominik Fischer wrote:
> It adds displaying error messages to the user via pam_prompt. Because in
> GDM the messages disappear so quick, I've added a new option
> "err_display_time". After
> a mes
2011/3/20 Dominik Fischer :
> Hello Ludovic,
>
> here my next patch (this time a big one).
>
> It adds displaying error messages to the user via pam_prompt. Because in
> GDM the messages disappear so quick, I've added a new option
> "err_display_time". After
> a message is shown with pam_prompt, a
Hello Ludovic,
here my next patch (this time a big one).
It adds displaying error messages to the user via pam_prompt. Because in
GDM the messages disappear so quick, I've added a new option
"err_display_time". After
a message is shown with pam_prompt, a "sleep(err_display_time)" is called. This
2011/3/20 Dominik Fischer :
> Hi Ludovic,
>
> sorry to bother you again... I've forgotten one line in my patch :-/
> Could you please also add the included patch?
Done in revision 490.
> Just to let you know: I've another patch pending. This will add
> more error messages presented to the users.
Hi Ludovic,
sorry to bother you again... I've forgotten one line in my patch :-/
Could you please also add the included patch?
Just to let you know: I've another patch pending. This will add
more error messages presented to the users. We have this working
for a long time and it really improved
2011/3/19 Dominik Fischer :
> Hello!
>
> pwent_mapper_find_user() searches through all available passwd db entries to
> find an user.
> This takes a very long time, if you have many users (1). Additionally, if
> you have nss-ldap
> configured, it transfers a large amount of data (which is exp
Hello!
pwent_mapper_find_user() searches through all available passwd db entries to
find an user.
This takes a very long time, if you have many users (1). Additionally, if
you have nss-ldap
configured, it transfers a large amount of data (which is expensive on mobile
connections...).
Incl
Hello Ludovic,
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 16:53 +0200, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> 2010/10/19 Andre Zepezauer :
> > Hello Ludovic,
> >
> > currently the mapper modules are unloaded only on authentication
> > failure. This patch let them unload on success too.
>
> Fixed in revision 465.
>
> Andre, do yo
2010/10/19 Andre Zepezauer :
> Hello Ludovic,
>
> currently the mapper modules are unloaded only on authentication
> failure. This patch let them unload on success too.
Fixed in revision 465.
Andre, do you want to have a write access to the pam_pkcs11
repository, and commit fixes directly?
Bye
Hello Ludovic,
currently the mapper modules are unloaded only on authentication
failure. This patch let them unload on success too.
Regards
Andre
Index: pam_pkcs11/pam_pkcs11.c
===
--- pam_pkcs11/pam_pkcs11.c (revision 464)
+++
2010/10/19 Andre Zepezauer :
> Hello Ludovic,
>
> the attached patch prevents the access of unallocated memory in
> pam_pkcs11. This happens while performing on-line certificate
> verification. The case where crl:s are fetched via http-request. Two
> additional fixes are included. Changes in detail
Hello Ludovic,
the attached patch prevents the access of unallocated memory in
pam_pkcs11. This happens while performing on-line certificate
verification. The case where crl:s are fetched via http-request. Two
additional fixes are included. Changes in detail:
* add missing return statement
* allo
2010/5/10 Andre Zepezauer :
> On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 09:20 +0200, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
>> Why do you check for pin == NULL?
>> Is NULL a valid return value for getpass()? Not from my manpage. So
>> patch rejected for now.
>
> Definition from Open Group:
> http://opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908775
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 09:20 +0200, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> 2010/5/10 Andre Zepezauer :
> > There is another issue with the output of debug messages. It is that the
> > users pin will be log by default. This can only be disabled at
> > compilation time. I assume that there will be always some syst
2010/5/10 Andre Zepezauer :
> There is another issue with the output of debug messages. It is that the
> users pin will be log by default. This can only be disabled at
> compilation time. I assume that there will be always some systems where
> debug is enabled. This is not a recommended practise, b
Hello Ludovic,
> 2010/9/20 Andre Zepezauer :
> > Hello,
> >
> > today I had to configure a host with pam_pkcs11. Doing that, I was
> > forced to edit the files in /etc/pam.d/ to get the debug messages of
> > pam_pkcs11. The corresponding option in the configuration file doesn't
> > have any effect
2010/9/20 Andre Zepezauer :
> Hello,
>
> today I had to configure a host with pam_pkcs11. Doing that, I was
> forced to edit the files in /etc/pam.d/ to get the debug messages of
> pam_pkcs11. The corresponding option in the configuration file doesn't
> have any effects. The attached patch fixes th
Hello,
today I had to configure a host with pam_pkcs11. Doing that, I was
forced to edit the files in /etc/pam.d/ to get the debug messages of
pam_pkcs11. The corresponding option in the configuration file doesn't
have any effects. The attached patch fixes this unexpected behaviour.
Regards
Andre
2010/6/26 Wolf Geldmacher :
> Here's a patch to solve the issues I've encountered using pam_pkcs11.
>
> In regards to #239 (pam_pkcs11 only looks at first certificate on
> token):
>
> The fix for this turns out to be somewhat problematic, and I'm not at
> all sure, whether my implementation of the
2010/6/26 Wolf Geldmacher :
> Here's a patch to solve the issues I've encountered using pam_pkcs11.
Thanks. I do not have the time now to review your patch, not before a few weeks.
But I keep your mail on my todo list.
Bye
--
Dr. Ludovic Rousseau
___
Here's a patch to solve the issues I've encountered using pam_pkcs11.
In regards to #239 (pam_pkcs11 only looks at first certificate on
token):
The fix for this turns out to be somewhat problematic, and I'm not at
all sure, whether my implementation of the fix is a valid one.
The basic problem (
Hello,
I just released a new version of pam_pkcs11. This version includes
many fixes I integrated since release 0.6.1.
Thanks to all the users for reporting bugs and patches.
Complete subversion changelog is:
2009-12-17 ludovic.rousseau
* [r390] doc/pkcs11_setup.1: document use_module
2009/12/2 Oleg Smirnov :
> Hi!
>
> pam_pkcs11 doesn't work with cards with no PIN installed. It tries to
> C_Login() whenever PIN is really needed and fails with "C_Login()
> failed: 0x0102".
>
> I've made a patch which corrects this behavior:
>
> * implements get_slot_login_required() funct
Hi!
pam_pkcs11 doesn't work with cards with no PIN installed. It tries to
C_Login() whenever PIN is really needed and fails with "C_Login()
failed: 0x0102".
I've made a patch which corrects this behavior:
* implements get_slot_login_required() function what checks whether
current slot req
2009/3/17 JonasOholm :
> Hi,
Hello,
> 1)
> I've been trying to use
> http://www.opensc-project.org/files/pam_pkcs11/snapshots/pam_pkcs11-0.6.0.tar.gz
> and also
> http://www.opensc-project.org/files/pam_pkcs11/pam_pkcs11-0.6.0.tar.gz
>
> Is it so that you have to download secutil.h from:
> http:/
Hello,
I uploaded pam_pkcs11 [1] version 0.6.1. Available at [2].
This version has many small fixes and improvements. See the
ChangeLog.svn file for an exhaustive list.
If you find bugs please report them using the bug tracker [3].
[1] https://www.opensc-project.org/pam_pkcs11/wiki
[2] http://w
Hi,
1)
I've been trying to use
http://www.opensc-project.org/files/pam_pkcs11/snapshots/pam_pkcs11-0.6.0.tar.gz
and also
http://www.opensc-project.org/files/pam_pkcs11/pam_pkcs11-0.6.0.tar.gz
Is it so that you have to download secutil.h from:
http://www.opensc-project.org/pam_pkcs11/browser/trun
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Stanislav Brabec wrote:
>>>
Could it be implemented using CERT_DecodeDERCertificate()?
>>>
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stanislav Brabec wrote:
Could it be implemented using CERT_DecodeDERCertificate()?
extern CERTCertificate *
CERT_DecodeDERCertificate (SECItem *derSignedCert, PRBool copyDER, char
*nickna
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stanislav Brabec wrote:
>> Could it be implemented using CERT_DecodeDERCertificate()?
>>
>> extern CERTCertificate *
>> CERT_DecodeDERCertificate (SECItem *derSignedCert, PRBool copyDER, char
>> *nickname);
>>
>
> Don't us
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When identical certs are imported into NSS, they are given the same
> reference counted pointer, so the test is as easy as:
> cert1 == cert2
Commited in revision 354.
Thanks.
--
Dr. Ludovic Rousseau
___
Stanislav Brabec wrote:
Robert Relyea wrote:
When identical certs are imported into NSS, they are given the same
reference counted pointer, so the test is as easy as:
cert1 == cert2
Thanks, and what about d2i_X509() counterpart:
undefined symbol: d2i_X509 (.libs/ldap
Robert Relyea wrote:
>When identical certs are imported into NSS, they are given the same
> reference counted pointer, so the test is as easy as:
>cert1 == cert2
Thanks, and what about d2i_X509() counterpart:
> > undefined symbol: d2i_X509 (.libs/ldap_mapper.so)
> >
> > So the libr
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
2008/10/24 Stanislav Brabec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
2008/10/17 Stanislav Brabec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
"Fixed" in revision 353.
http://www.opensc-project.org/pam_pkcs11/changeset/353
Not yet completely. This seems to be critical
2008/10/24 Stanislav Brabec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
>> 2008/10/17 Stanislav Brabec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> "Fixed" in revision 353.
>> http://www.opensc-project.org/pam_pkcs11/changeset/353
>
> Not yet completely. This seems to be critical:
Not really critical in fact :-)
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> 2008/10/17 Stanislav Brabec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> "Fixed" in revision 353.
> http://www.opensc-project.org/pam_pkcs11/changeset/353
Not yet completely. This seems to be critical:
ldap_mapper.c: In function 'ldap_get_certificate':
ldap_mapper.c:760: warning: assignment
2008/10/17 Stanislav Brabec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Stanislav Brabec wrote:
>> Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
>> > But I have two warnings:
>> > ldap_mapper.c:874: warning: passing argument 1 of 'X509_cmp' from
>> > incompatible pointer type
>> > ldap_mapper.c:874: warning: passing argument 2 of 'X509_cmp'
Stanislav Brabec wrote:
> Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> > But I have two warnings:
> > ldap_mapper.c:874: warning: passing argument 1 of 'X509_cmp' from
> > incompatible pointer type
> > ldap_mapper.c:874: warning: passing argument 2 of 'X509_cmp' from
> > incompatible pointer type
>
> I spent a quite
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> But I have two warnings:
> ldap_mapper.c:874: warning: passing argument 1 of 'X509_cmp' from
> incompatible pointer type
> ldap_mapper.c:874: warning: passing argument 2 of 'X509_cmp' from
> incompatible pointer type
I spent a quite a lot of time to identify this problem.
2008/10/15 Stanislav Brabec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Attached two patches fix compilation errors or warnings when compiling
> with NSS support.
>
> Compiler messages are mentioned in patch headers.
Corrected in revision 347 and 348. Thanks
> Note that implicit declaration fix again refers to implic
Attached two patches fix compilation errors or warnings when compiling
with NSS support.
Compiler messages are mentioned in patch headers.
Note that implicit declaration fix again refers to implicit declaration
of function 'X509_cmp' problem, which may need x509.h, but location of
this header may
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> 2008/9/25 Stanislav Brabec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > pam_pkcs11-implicit-declaration.patch: Fixes implicit declaration and
> > possible crash on 64 bits. More information in the patch header.
>
> I do not have a ssl/x509.h file on my system. I have openssl/x509.h
> and th
2008/9/25 Stanislav Brabec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hallo.
>
> There are several patches from the openSUSE pam_pkcs11 package.
>
> Feel free to pick them for the upstream package.
>
> All of them should apply on current trunk:
>
> pam_pkcs11-implicit-declaration.patch: Fixes implicit declaration and
Hallo.
There are several patches from the openSUSE pam_pkcs11 package.
Feel free to pick them for the upstream package.
All of them should apply on current trunk:
pam_pkcs11-implicit-declaration.patch: Fixes implicit declaration and
possible crash on 64 bits. More information in the patch heade
Hello Michael,
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Juan Antonio Martinez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El mié, 18-06-2008 a las 23:29 +0200, Michael Grünewald escribió:
>> Hello,
>> during work for a seminar about smartcards and linux I found pam_pkcs11,
>> which works really nice. But I think there i
El mié, 18-06-2008 a las 23:29 +0200, Michael Grünewald escribió:
> Hello,
> during work for a seminar about smartcards and linux I found pam_pkcs11,
> which works really nice. But I think there is a major security issue in the
> card_eventmgr/pkcs11_cardmgr configuration samples. The screensaver
Am Montag, 25. Februar 2008 11:28:21 schrieb Ludovic Rousseau:
> I added the missing files (I guess)
>
> I can now do:
> $ svn co trunk
> $ cd trunk
> $ ./bootstrap
> $ ./configure
> $ make distcheck
ok, thanks a lot! will see if tonight snapshot cron job now works.
good night,
Andreas
_
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2008 15:36:05 schrieb Ludovic Rousseau:
>
> > I have no real objection to add po/Makefile.in.in anc config.rpath
> > (and others) in SVN. They both are installed by running gettextize.
> > Th
Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2008 15:36:05 schrieb Ludovic Rousseau:
> I have no real objection to add po/Makefile.in.in anc config.rpath
> (and others) in SVN. They both are installed by running gettextize.
> They can be updated if needed.
can you do so? at least my versions of the tools didn't create
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Andreas Jellinghaus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> po/Makefile.in.in is missing from svn.
>
> any reason not to add it?
Because it is (re)created by gettextize?
> I can generate it with gettextize, but that changes lots of other stuff as
> well, so I don't think
also Makefile.am mentions config.rpath - which is not available
on my system or not installed (guess it can be deleted).
after "make maintainer-clean" I noticed a number of files still there -
"svn log" doesn't show them because of svn:ignore property, but
a diff with an untouched checkout shows
po/Makefile.in.in is missing from svn.
any reason not to add it?
I can generate it with gettextize, but that changes lots of other stuff as
well, so I don't think we want that command in bootstrap script.
I guess the svn ignore on "*.in" cought it and thus it was only forgotten
by accident, but
On 18/06/07, Douglas E. Engert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds like you should have two version, an OpenSSL based version,
> and an NSS based version at least until the issues are addressed.
>
> Not only will the pam_pkcs11 be calling NSS or OpenSSL, other pam modules in
> the pam stack or even
Sounds like you should have two version, an OpenSSL based version,
and an NSS based version at least until the issues are addressed.
Not only will the pam_pkcs11 be calling NSS or OpenSSL, other pam modules in
the pam stack or even the application may be using OpenSSL. For example,
one may want t
Robert,
I don't want to offend anyone, but I think that now pam_pkcs11 is a big mess.
Some of the features are available when nss is used and some are not.
Some parameters are taken from extenal nss configuration some from
pam_pkcs11 configuration.
You need to manage the module in two different wa
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> 2. I've look at the code. It seems like you added the whole nss into
> the source... I don't understand why... You can use the external
> library files.
>
No, I definately did not add all of NSS, it used NSS from a shared
library. I'm not sure what code you think is NSS. Wha
On 6/16/07, Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1. The new version prompt some annoying messages in X... This is
> > related to the new pam_prompt addition when HAVE_SECURITY_PAM_EXT_H is
> > defined.
> pam_prompt should not be blocking, pam_prompt only displays information.
> If it's bloc
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Hello Ludovic,
1. The new version prompt some annoying messages in X... This is
related to the new pam_prompt addition when HAVE_SECURITY_PAM_EXT_H is
defined.
pam_prompt should not be blocking, pam_prompt only displays information.
If it's blocking, then there is somethi
Hello Ludovic,
1. The new version prompt some annoying messages in X... This is
related to the new pam_prompt addition when HAVE_SECURITY_PAM_EXT_H is
defined.
2. I've look at the code. It seems like you added the whole nss into
the source... I don't understand why... You can use the external
lib
Hello Ludovic,
Something is different with this version.
When I unlock xsession I see messages like:
Please insert smart card or enter user name
Must press
Smart card inserted
Must press
Welcome
Must press
This is very annoying...
What was changed?
On 6/11/07, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTEC
On 11/06/07, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW: We can shrink up the code if next version will use pkcs11-helper :)
Please, send a patch.
I just hope it will not collide with the NSS support. I imagine NSS
and pkcs11-helper are orthogonal features, aren't they?
bye
--
Dr. Ludovic
Thanks!
NSS seems to be overkill for most requirements...
But I understand the maintenance argument, but I don't think
maintaining NSS is simpler thank OpenSSL... :)
BTW: Slotevents and multi provider is offered by pkcs11-helper as
well, so solution may be much simpler :)
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On 6/11/07, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This new version contains the patches from RedHat to use NSS instead
of OpenSSL and many other improvements they made. See the
ChangeLog.svn file for an exhaustive list.
Hi!
Great!
I am curios, why did you swi
On 6/11/07, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This new version contains the patches from RedHat to use NSS instead
> of OpenSSL and many other improvements they made. See the
> ChangeLog.svn file for an exhaustive list.
Hi!
Great!
I am curios, why did you switch to NSS?
BTW: We can s
Hello,
After more than a year without a new version I uploaded pam_pkcs11 [1]
version 0.6.0. Available at [2].
This new version contains the patches from RedHat to use NSS instead
of OpenSSL and many other improvements they made. See the
ChangeLog.svn file for an exhaustive list.
pam_pkcs11 can
On 23/05/07, Lane, Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First off, I've created a new LDAP mapping module for using the CN
> attribute. Where do I send the code?
Just here on this list.
> Second, the code I'm sending in may need to be cleaned up some. I'm not
> usually a C programmer, so there are l
Hi all. I'm new to this list, so I apologize in advance if I ask any
noobish questions.
First off, I've created a new LDAP mapping module for using the CN
attribute. Where do I send the code?
Second, the code I'm sending in may need to be cleaned up some. I'm not
usually a C programmer, so
On 21/05/07, Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It looks like an added file didn't get put in the repository:
> src/tools/pkcs11_setup.c
Argh. Exact. Commited in revision 273.
> I'll get the 3 patch ready shortly.
OK. Thanks
--
Dr. Ludovic Rousseau
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
>> > I can
>> > supply a patch that will also work with older versions of pam,
and use
>> > configure to determine which you have.
>>
>> That would be great. Otherwise pam_pkcs11 could not be complied on
>> Debian (and derivatives) without hacking.
>
> Any progress on t
On 16/05/07, Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> > On 09/05/07, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On 09/05/07, Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> >> > > On 13/04/07, Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
On 09/05/07, Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> > On 13/04/07, Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I can't find the needed file security/pam_ext.h in your patch. I guess
> > you forgot to add --new-file when you used diff :-)
> >
> > Can you send the missi
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
On 13/04/07, Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here's patch installment 2 of 3.
I can't find the needed file security/pam_ext.h in your patch. I guess
you forgot to add --new-file when you used diff :-)
Can you send the missing file?
It's part of pam 0.99.6.2 (s
On 20/04/07, S. Wefel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ludovic Rousseau schrieb:
> > On 04/04/07, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I, more or less, use pam-pkcs11. I would really be interested in
> >> integrating your RedHat patches.
> >
> > And I work on the pam_pkcs11 source code righ
On 13/04/07, Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's patch installment 2 of 3.
I can't find the needed file security/pam_ext.h in your patch. I guess
you forgot to add --new-file when you used diff :-)
Can you send the missing file?
Bye
--
Dr. Ludovic Rousseau
_
81 matches
Mail list logo
