Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> https://www.opensc-project.org/files/openct/testing/
> https://www.opensc-project.org/files/openct/testing/openct-0.6.12-pre3.tar.gz
>
> https://www.opensc-project.org/files/opensc/testing/
> https://www.opensc-project.org/files/opensc/testing/opensc-0.11.3-pre2.tar.
You may want to change the version number in the win32/revision.rc:
--- ,version.rc Wed May 10 01:15:26 2006
+++ version.rc Thu Jul 5 11:16:46 2007
@@ -19,8 +19,8 @@
#endif
VS_VERSION_INFO VERSIONINFO
- FILEVERSION 0,11,1,0
- PRODUCTVERSION 0,11,1,0
+ FILEVERSION 0,11,3,0
+ PRODUCTVERSION 0
Andreas Jellinghaus wrote :
>> https://www.opensc-project.org/files/openct/testing/openct-0.6.12-pre3.tar.gz
That's fine.
>> https://www.opensc-project.org/files/opensc/testing/opensc-0.11.3-pre2.tar.gz
I have a regression with this one. I didn't investigate further yet, but
a simple 'ls' insid
> I've tested opensc-0.11.3-pre2 with Oberthur card.
>
> There were two bugs in libopensc/card-oberthur.c ,
> 'compute_signature' returns output allocation length, instead of
> response length ;
> invalid internal pin reference procedure that has an impact on the
> unblocking procedure .
>
> The ch
Andreas Jellinghaus a écrit :
> https://www.opensc-project.org/files/openct/testing/
> https://www.opensc-project.org/files/openct/testing/openct-0.6.12-pre3.tar.gz
>
> https://www.opensc-project.org/files/opensc/testing/
> https://www.opensc-project.org/files/opensc/testing/opensc-0.11.3-pre2.tar.
