Hi,
is there someone who could please tell me where to get a SECCOS card in
Germany? I browsed the internet but couldn't find a source :-/
Some banks sell those cards but only to their customers :-(
Kind regards
Martin
--
"Things are only impossible until they're not"
AqBanking - http://www
Hi,
Sparkasse sells Seccos Cards with qualified signatures even to non customers
(Konto ungebunden).
Kind Regards
Stefan Engelbert
Aloaha Software
-Original Message-
From: Martin Preuss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 3:28 PM
To: OpenSC-devel
Subject: [opensc-
Witness the duality of:
LIBASSUAN_LIBS
LIBASSUAN_CFLAGS
and
ASSUAN_LIBS
ASSUAN_CFLAGS
in the build system for opensc.
For this error (using $(ASSUAN_LIBS) instead of $(LIBASSUAN_LIBS))
opensc-signer.so does not correctly link against the symbols in
libassuan, and crashes when a signing atte
opensc-signer by default does not use the nonrepudiating key when
generating digital signature. This is most evident from the fact that
the PIN code asked by the pinentry is for the "Perustunnus" instead of
"Allekirjoitustunnus".
To fix this issue, two places need to be changed in opensc-suppo
All right. I have this deja vu feeling about this, because I recall
identifying this problem a few years ago, and very little has happened
with opensc-signer in all this time.
I'd be willing to work on the signer, so that use of, say, setec setweb
will no longer be required for performing digi
On 11.10.2006, at 3:43, Antti S. Lankila wrote:
The anatomy of the problem is this. If you go to https://
vrk.fineid.fi/ and log on, the system asks for the pins for both of
your keys (what does it ask the pin for the nonrepudiation key
for?), and provides my certificate to the remote host,
Hi,
Just to stay on the topic - dealing with the same problem in firefox
2.0. Now you tell me what is right and what is not right (I don't
know signer, but where and how the decision should be done for the
used certificate?) Is it documented, that nonrep key should be used?
Does the signa
Martin Paljak wrote:
Hi,
Just to stay on the topic - dealing with the same problem in firefox
2.0. Now you tell me what is right and what is not right (I don't know
signer, but where and how the decision should be done for the used
certificate?) Is it documented, that nonrep key should be use
Martin Paljak wrote:
On 11.10.2006, at 3:43, Antti S. Lankila wrote:
The anatomy of the problem is this. If you go to
https://vrk.fineid.fi/ and log on, the system asks for the pins for
both of your keys (what does it ask the pin for the nonrepudiation
key for?), and provides my certificate
Okay, these two tasks are the last ones, before the signer component
would be ready for wider consumption. Before it's anywhere near sane to
allow user to sign documents that legally binds her, it would be good
idea to:
1) visualize the data about the be signed. We are assuming, of course,
t
On 10/10/06, Antti S. Lankila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Witness the duality of:
LIBASSUAN_LIBS
LIBASSUAN_CFLAGS
and
ASSUAN_LIBS
ASSUAN_CFLAGS
in the build system for opensc.
For this error (using $(ASSUAN_LIBS) instead of $(LIBASSUAN_LIBS))
opensc-signer.so does not correctly link against t
11 matches
Mail list logo
