On 29.11.2006, at 1:22, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
also I think werner is also very active with these topics, read and
heard a lot about it. but still we are no lawyers and might be
completely wrong, even if I think the chances for this are small.
Why not contact RSA labs directly (or as
Andreas Jellinghaus ha scritto:
so I can print the document (unchanged, so complient to this license),
and give it to someone else. that person receives a book from me,
nothing else. no contract or anything binding that person to me or
rsa labs. no obligation from rsa labs to me to not give anyon
Hello, I'm the original author of the logo (chip-key) you still seem to be
using, after all these years :) Don't panic, I'm NOT writing here to claim
it back, or to make demands, since it was commissioned exclusively for
the project by one (ex-)project member (Antti Tapaninen), anyway.
Actually
On 29/11/06, Matti Hamalainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello, I'm the original author of the logo (chip-key) you still seem to be
using, after all these years :) Don't panic, I'm NOT writing here to claim
it back, or to make demands, since it was commissioned exclusively for
the project by one
Hello !
I also have an DATEV SmartCard. But whatever i try, i can't get
Thunderbird to work with that card. How did you do that ?
If i can make some dumps with an opensc-tool for "debugging" or whatever
just let me know (and tell me how to do this - on an windows-xp-system).
Thank you so far
Alessandro Premoli wrote:
Perfect. Then we could only extract all the functions and data types
from the specs, create an header file that is *identical* to the
original one (perhaps with mis-ordered lines) but *without* the ugly
license and we are all ok. You are saying so, we are copying small
