Re: [opensc-devel] build fatal

2010-02-11 Thread Viktor TARASOV
François Leblanc wrote: > Hello > > I can’t build anymore opensc, get failure : > > Cannot export sc_der_clear: symbol not defined > > Should I remove « sc_der_clear » from libopensc.exports list ? > > Any objections ? > Yes, it was not used. > François. > Viktor. > > ---

Re: [opensc-devel] serial number of USB smart card adapters

2010-02-11 Thread Martin Paljak
On Feb 9, 2010, at 12:56 , Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > usualy a smart card or usb crypto token has certificates on it, > and they can be read without any user verification. so monitoring > is always possible in such setups. That's one way of approaching it, and things like public eID cards (wher

[opensc-devel] new ubuntu packages

2010-02-11 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Thanks to Stephan Hermann new openct and opensc packages for ubuntu are available: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openct/0.6.19-1ubuntu2 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opensc/0.11.12-1ubuntu1 To my knowledge they contain all the changes and fixes we wanted for packaging, so Ubuntu 10.

Re: [opensc-devel] new ubuntu packages

2010-02-11 Thread Aleksey Samsonov
Hello, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > Thanks to Stephan Hermann new openct and opensc > packages for ubuntu are available: > > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openct/0.6.19-1ubuntu2 > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opensc/0.11.12-1ubuntu1 > > To my knowledge they contain all the changes

Re: [opensc-devel] new ubuntu packages

2010-02-11 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
hmm. for openct we can create a new release. are there any other pending changes, that should go into an openct release? for opensc a 0.12 release from trunks is several weeks away, as we are still doing many cleanups and changes. we could release another 0.11.* with a backport of some changes. w

Re: [opensc-devel] new ubuntu packages

2010-02-11 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
2010/2/11 Andreas Jellinghaus : > but does anyone know when the debian freeze is? > IIRC they plan some major new version too, so > we should try to get working packages in debian too. The freeze was initially planned for February 2010 to be in sync with Ubuntu next LTS. >From [1]: " We hoped to

Re: [opensc-devel] new ubuntu packages

2010-02-11 Thread Peter Stuge
Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > for all other distributions I have little clue about > their release schedule Gentoo is easy - submit new ebuilds to bugzilla and if they're clean they will end up in the public portage tree. If a Gentoo developer gives it priority in their workqueue it happens in a fe

Re: [opensc-devel] new ubuntu packages

2010-02-11 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Am Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010 13:27:08 schrieb Ludovic Rousseau: > So no idea when the Debian freeze will happen. ok. but that still indicates we should get working packages into debian soon, as one a freeze is announced, only bugfixes are allowed, but no new versions of something IIRC. Andreas _

Re: [opensc-devel] Regression test in src/tests/regression

2010-02-11 Thread Viktor TARASOV
Hello Jean-Michel, Jean-Michel Pouré wrote: > Dear friends, > > Would it be possible to discuss about regression tests. I would like to > review these tests to certify a number of cards. > > On my system, regression test fail during erase because pkcs15-init -E > may return messages and fail. >

Re: [opensc-devel] new ubuntu packages

2010-02-11 Thread Aktiv Co. Kirill Mescheryakov
It would be nice if you could add to opensc 0.11.11 Alexey's Samsonov patches for Rutoken S. They tested by me. In this case Rutoken S would work in Ubuntu and there would be no problems with the inclusion of unstable version 0.12 Regards, Cyril ___ op

Re: [opensc-devel] [opensc-commits] svn openct changed[1181] For packaged tar. gz files with builds inside the source,

2010-02-11 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Am Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010 13:49:05 schrieb Alon Bar-Lev: > No it isn't... > The generated files should not be cleaned if .tar.gz is used, only if > this is svn checkout, as we assume that we can "make dist" offline. hu? sorry, I don't understand what your point is. my preference is this: * pe

[opensc-devel] new 0.11.13 branch for 0.11.* updates

2010-02-11 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Hi, I create an 0.11.13 release branch for changes we want to see in the next 0.11.* release. please: only small, well tested changes. make sure it compiles and works well with the 0.11.* code (which is now quite different from current trunk). svn co https://www.opensc-project.org/svn/opensc/rel

Re: [opensc-devel] [opensc-commits] svn opensc changed[4019] libopensc: in

2010-02-11 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Am Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010 15:18:30 schrieb Viktor TARASOV: > webmas...@opensc-project.org wrote: > > Revision: 4019 > > Author: viktor.tarasov > > Date: 2010-02-11 14:15:13 + (Thu, 11 Feb 2010) > > > > Log Message: > > --- > > libopensc: in > > Sorry, its gone without complet

Re: [opensc-devel] [opensc-commits] svn opensc changed[4019] libopensc: in

2010-02-11 Thread Martin Paljak
On Feb 11, 2010, at 16:23 , Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > Am Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010 15:18:30 schrieb Viktor TARASOV: >> webmas...@opensc-project.org wrote: >>> Revision: 4019 >>> Author: viktor.tarasov >>> Date: 2010-02-11 14:15:13 + (Thu, 11 Feb 2010) >>> >>> Log Message: >>> ---

Re: [opensc-devel] new 0.11.13 branch for 0.11.* updates

2010-02-11 Thread Martin Paljak
On Feb 11, 2010, at 16:13 , Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > Hi, > > I create an 0.11.13 release branch for changes > we want to see in the next 0.11.* release. Are there any *critical* issues that need to be fixed at all? -- Martin Paljak http://martin.paljak.pri.ee +3725156495

Re: [opensc-devel] [opensc-commits] svn opensc changed[4019] libopensc: in

2010-02-11 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Am Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010 15:27:56 schrieb Martin Paljak: > What about EMV - we don't support EMV cards in any way and probably never > will in near future, do the "EMV card, but can't do anything with it" > information seems useful or not? I all for it. in fact unusable driver seem to confu

Re: [opensc-devel] [opensc-commits] svn opensc changed[4019] libopensc: in

2010-02-11 Thread Martin Paljak
On Feb 11, 2010, at 16:34 , Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > Am Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010 15:27:56 schrieb Martin Paljak: >> What about EMV - we don't support EMV cards in any way and probably never >> will in near future, do the "EMV card, but can't do anything with it" >> information seems useful or

Re: [opensc-devel] [opensc-commits] svn openct changed[1181] For packaged tar. gz files with builds inside the source,

2010-02-11 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
If you offline and do "make distclean" and you remove the generated files then if you try to "make dist" you: 1. Must be online while compiling. 2. Must use more tools which autoconf will not configure: XSLTPROC, SVN, TR, WGET Compiling from svn does not require you to have dependency if you do

Re: [opensc-devel] Problems developing with Starcos 2.3

2010-02-11 Thread Viktor TARASOV
Fernando Sanchez Chaparro wrote: > Hi Andreas, Thank you very much for your answer. > > 2010/2/4 Andreas Jellinghaus > > > Hi Fernando, > > your problem is this: >starcos_ops.delete_file = NULL; > > the starcos driver does not implement delete f

Re: [opensc-devel] new 0.11.13 branch for 0.11.* updates

2010-02-11 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Am Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010 15:32:15 schrieb Martin Paljak: > On Feb 11, 2010, at 16:13 , Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I create an 0.11.13 release branch for changes > > we want to see in the next 0.11.* release. > > Are there any *critical* issues that need to be fixed at all? no