Hello,
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 23:46, Viktor TARASOV
wrote:
> Le 08/04/2011 18:46, Martin Paljak a écrit :
>> I would not put the inf to the installer if it did not do anything
>> semi-universally useful yet, for what it's worth.
> As I understood, it's not the final MSI version .
No. I'm about t
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 19:24, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
>> OpenSSL is used, there is not (yet) zlib included. I plan to fix that
>> tomorrow.
>
> Ok, when some of the tools where not built, I assumed it was OpenSSL was not
> included.
> I was using OpenSSL-0.9.8d, but I will have to look at 1.0.0
A little patch to "installer_from_build.sh" script to use correct mingw prefix
on win32 builds
Requires "lsb-core" package Ubuntu- or "redhat_lsb" -redhat/fedora-
-
# use mingw to generate binaries
+DistID=`lsb_release -is`
+case $DistID in
+Fedora ) p
jons...@terra.es wrote:
> A little patch to "installer_from_build.sh" script to use correct
> mingw prefix on win32 builds
Tricky. I don't think "correct" is defined by what the distribution
happens to have packaged. :\
//Peter
___
opensc-devel mailing
On Apr 12, 2011, at 15:48 , Peter Stuge wrote:
> jons...@terra.es wrote:
>> A little patch to "installer_from_build.sh" script to use correct
>> mingw prefix on win32 builds
>
> Tricky. I don't think "correct" is defined by what the distribution
> happens to have packaged. :\
Well, the idea her
