Re: [opensc-devel] state of the project?

2012-11-21 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
Hello, 2012/11/18 Andreas Schwier : > My point is, that I offer to do the integration on opensc-java (as I > already had commit rights to the old repository). I just created a "OpenSC-Java maintainers" team. Give me your github login and I add you to the team. You will then be able to push change

Re: [opensc-devel] state of the project?

2012-11-21 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
Hello, 2012/11/17 Alon Bar-Lev : > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Ludovic Rousseau >> I don't think I can give you admin access to only these 2 projects. >> I can add you as a member of the OpenSC organisation and you would >> have access to all the repositories. > > Yes you can, there are team

Re: [opensc-devel] New SE (Security Element) Company Formed

2012-11-21 Thread Martin Paljak
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Anders Rundgren wrote: > Another hurdle is that the GP security model is incompatible with the > Internet: GP presumes mutual authentication AFAIK. This is how the > Google Wallet currently works (Google holds the master keys to the SE) > but that's not really cu

Re: [opensc-devel] Technical Description - Android Embedded SE

2012-11-21 Thread Martin Paljak
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Frank Cusack wrote: > There are at least 2 vendors of such cards today, and at least one vendor of > a card that includes a PINpad. $$$ and very niche. Also, no one really > wants to use such a card. Interesting. Do you have pointers? I mean cards that have the

Re: [opensc-devel] state of the project?

2012-11-21 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
2012/11/18 Ludovic Rousseau : > 2012/11/18 Viktor Tarasov : >> mailing list will go (without archive ?) to SourceForge, or, in case of the >> last minute obstacles, to groups.google.com. > > The numbers of members to the 3 lists hosted at opensc-project.org are: > 546 opensc-devel_members.txt

Re: [opensc-devel] state of the project?

2012-11-21 Thread Martin Paljak
Hello On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Ludovic Rousseau wrote: > But Martin is now missing. :) I've not fallen off the edge of the earth, but I've been only digesting e-mails that have been addressed to me directly and thus ended up in main inbox (which not many have, at least according to gmail

Re: [opensc-devel] state of the project?

2012-11-21 Thread Andreas Schwier
It's probably a good occasion to clean-up the list. We should define a date at which we switch to the new list and send a final termination notice with pointers to the new list. After that notice we should reject any further e-mails to the list and keep the archive around a little longer. Andreas

Re: [opensc-devel] state of the project?

2012-11-21 Thread Martin Paljak
Hello, On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Ludovic Rousseau wrote: > Maybe some people are on the list but no more interested by OpenSC. > Maybe they just redirect the emails into the spam/trash folder. There's a fairly constant flow of people to and off the list according to subscription notices,

Re: [opensc-devel] state of the project?

2012-11-21 Thread Martin Paljak
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: > Ludovic Rousseau wrote: >> The idea of git is to _not_ have to give access. Just send pull >> requests and I (or another admin) will pull your code. No, the purpose of git must not be limiting access :) > > Yes and no. Multiple people writing

Re: [opensc-devel] state of the project?

2012-11-21 Thread Martin Paljak
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Martin Paljak wrote: >> Yes and no. Multiple people writing to a central repo works perfectly >> fine also with git. > Yes. > > The Original Goal(tm) was that instead of bureaucratic rubber-stamping > commits and dividing the whoever extra pair of eyes and brains

Re: [opensc-devel] state of the project?

2012-11-21 Thread Martin Paljak
Bonjour, On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Ludovic Rousseau wrote: > Andreas, the host available at opensc-project.org will disapear at the end > of the year 2012 [2]. There will be a semi-managed (meaning managed backup and other monitoring) Debian box available for the foreseeable future. I'l

Re: [opensc-devel] New SE (Security Element) Company Formed

2012-11-21 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
2012/11/21 Martin Paljak : > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Anders Rundgren > wrote: > >> Another hurdle is that the GP security model is incompatible with the >> Internet: GP presumes mutual authentication AFAIK. This is how the >> Google Wallet currently works (Google holds the master keys to

Re: [opensc-devel] New SE (Security Element) Company Formed

2012-11-21 Thread Martin Paljak
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > 2012/11/21 Martin Paljak : >> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Anders Rundgren >> wrote: >> >>> Another hurdle is that the GP security model is incompatible with the >>> Internet: GP presumes mutual authentication AFAIK. This is how t

Re: [opensc-devel] New SE (Security Element) Company Formed

2012-11-21 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
2012/11/21 Martin Paljak : > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Andreas Jellinghaus > wrote: >> 2012/11/21 Martin Paljak : >>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Anders Rundgren >>> wrote: >>> Another hurdle is that the GP security model is incompatible with the Internet: GP presumes mutual

Re: [opensc-devel] state of the project?

2012-11-21 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Ludovic Rousseau wrote: > > Hello, > > 2012/11/17 Alon Bar-Lev : > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Ludovic Rousseau > >> I don't think I can give you admin access to only these 2 projects. > >> I can add you as a member of the OpenSC organisation and you would