y ambitions to secure the
card-to-terminal communication by default?
Isn't it urgently necessary to use ad-hoc interoperable
security routines in the light of the legal status of digital
signatures within the EU?
Definitely.
Bye,
Roberto Resoli.
Andreas Jellinghaus ha scritto:
> On Wednesday 16 May 2007 12:07:53 Gab C wrote:
>> I'm searching for a pkcs11 driver for Italian CIE (eid). Looking to past
>> threads (*Feb 26 2004*) i see a pkcs-15 emulator for that card was already
>> developed, but i don't see it on the development stream. Does
g
> 0x87 matches a padding indicator and ciphertext, 0x8E matches a
> cryptographic checksum) , the INS=86 apdu does not seem to be
standardized,
> so I don't really know how it operates.
I guess you are referring to the "GIVE RANDOM" APDU, see the
specification at chapter
Il giorno ven, 23/07/2010 alle 15.09 +0200, Viktor TARASOV ha scritto:
> resoli - libero wrote:
> > Il giorno lun, 21/06/2010 alle 11.05 +0200, Viktor TARASOV ha scritto:
[...]
> Actually, in the IAS/ECC branch of OpenSC there is an implementation of
> the 'local' SM module.
> The card supported b
Il giorno gio, 18/10/2007 alle 14.37 +, Franz Brandl ha scritto:
> that would correspond to the "unsafe environment" configuration of the
> Austrian Citizen Card. However, this card may alternatively operate in
> an "safe environment" mode where it does not require SM to use the
> private sign
Il giorno mer, 24/10/2007 alle 10.22 +, Franz Brandl ha scritto:
> yes, exactly. do you know whether the CNS card follows the concept, too ?
Unfortunately, CNS seems not to follow it. There are some rumors that
in future it will, but take this only as a rumor, there are no official
statement
