Am 21.11.2011 16:50, schrieb Carsten Neumann:
> Hello Michael,
>
> On 11/21/2011 09:06 AM, Michael Raab wrote:
>> as far as I can see the problems we had are gone now. So thank you very much
>> for fixing. From our side you may go ahead and commit the made changes...
> thanks for testing! Ch
Hello Michael,
On 11/21/2011 09:06 AM, Michael Raab wrote:
> as far as I can see the problems we had are gone now. So thank you very much
> for fixing. From our side you may go ahead and commit the made changes...
thanks for testing! Changes committed.
> p.s. any news from mcast section
600
> Von: Carsten Neumann
> An: opensg-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Opensg-users] OpenSG1.8 - Geometry functions
> Hello Michael,
>
> On 11/15/2011 01:07 PM, Michael Raab wrote:
> > 3. calling calcVertexNormals(geo, angle) first, then
> >
Hello Michael,
On 11/15/2011 01:07 PM, Michael Raab wrote:
3. calling calcVertexNormals(geo, angle) first, then
calcVertexNormal(geo), then calcVertexNormals(geo, angle) again
and so on also increases the indices size
calcVertexNormals(geo, angle) now looks for an ind
-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:13:18 -0600
> Von: Carsten Neumann
> An: opensg-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Opensg-users] OpenSG1.8 - Geometry functions
> Hello Michael,
>
> On 11/15/2011 01:07 PM, Michael Raab wrote:
> > I'
Hello Michael,
On 11/15/2011 01:07 PM, Michael Raab wrote:
I've tried both patches. These are the results:
thanks for testing!
1. osg::calcFaceNormals(geo) is still buggy. Indices size is still
increasing
in general that can not be avoided. It is possible that a positio
Hi Carsten,
I've tried both patches. These are the results:
1. osg::calcFaceNormals(geo) is still buggy. Indices size is still
increasing and result normals are still wrong. Calling it twice now
destroys the geometry :)
2. osg::calcVertexTangents(geo) seems to work fine now
3. cal
Hello Michael,
On 11/14/2011 08:59 AM, Michael Raab wrote:
2.) osg::calcVertexTangents() creates not enough tangents and binormals, e.g.
for a simple plane only 3 tangents are created...
this one seems to be a off-by-one in accounting for the property size.
Can you try the attached p
Hello Michael,
On 11/14/2011 08:59 AM, Michael Raab wrote:
there seem to be some problems inside the geometry functions. Here are the
first (that I can reproduce easily):
it sounds like you have code to reproduce these problems, any chance you
can share it so we don't have to go and
