drscofi...@opensimulator.org wrote:
Author: drscofield
Date: 2009-04-29 02:35:35 -0700 (Wed, 29 Apr 2009)
New Revision: 9339
Modified:
trunk/OpenSim/ApplicationPlugins/RemoteController/RemoteAdminPlugin.cs
Log:
From: Alan Webb alan_w...@us.ibm.com
Added two new (optional)
Stefan Andersson wrote:
How about
---
[RegionResourceServices]
;GridService = OpenSim.Region.Communications.Hypergrid.dll, HGGridServices
;GridService = OpenSim.Region.Communications.Local.dll, LocalBackEndServices
GridService = OpenSim.Region.Communications.OGS1.dll, OGS1GridServices
Maybe the right name for it is
OpenSim.Region.ResourceServicesConnectors.dll
d...@metaverseink.com wrote:
Stefan Andersson wrote:
How about
---
[RegionResourceServices]
;GridService = OpenSim.Region.Communications.Hypergrid.dll, HGGridServices
;GridService =
Hurliman, John wrote:
Currently, OpenSim server-server communication is primarily made up of .NET
XML serialization. As a side effect of this, I've seen the wire format
between simulator and grid services or grid service to grid service change
many times since I started working on backend
We could then have an method similar to the way we define/select physics
engines;
2. On your previous suggested ini stuff, in my opinion something like
UserService = { local | remote }
would be clearer than
LocalUserService = {True|False}
So that each UserService module needs to
Just a heads up; I will probably not have time to champion the release cycle I
have outlined in earlier posts - I hereby declare and underline it being a
community effort.
Best regards,
Stefan Andersson
From: r...@ralf-haifisch.biz
To: opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009
Justin Clark-Casey wrote:
I like this generally but I do have the following comments.
1. I'm not a huge fan of this since, like Stefan, I'd ideally like it to be
possible to package an OpenSim that
supports only a single architecture, with no trace of other architecture code
in there at
I still think all that stuff can be put in region modules
Melanie
d...@metaverseink.com wrote:
Maybe the right name for it is
OpenSim.Region.ResourceServicesConnectors.dll
d...@metaverseink.com wrote:
Stefan Andersson wrote:
How about
---
[RegionResourceServices]
;GridService =
I think that there is a technical obstacle to doing that: the master
avatar stuff, that happens early on in the application (OpenSimBase,
line 688), needs to have the communication code in place. I think --
although I may be wrong -- that that happens before region modules are
in place.
I have done a lot of stuff related to that. Master avatar should not
even exist in the way it still does today, that is legacy. The very
same thing can be done in another way (code-wise).
So the existing master avatar stuff can be removed,if that is the
only blocker, i'll think up some new
I would urge us to make changes to the master avatar stuff with notice and
encouragement of folks to write FAQ, wiki entries, mini-apnotes and anything
else that will help cut down on confusion of those who have significant effort
invested into builds on existing regions.
Charles
Thank you for taking a look. Looks like I all of the ExtraData for prims,
including sculpt/particles/flexi/etc. I'll see what OpenSim is doing for saving
script state and add everything in a second pass. I'm hoping that this
particular format captures everything needed to save simulator state
I'm also noticing that the region registration with the grid happens
before the post-initialization of the region modules, at least as of
now. In other words, the design has been that Comms would be in place
very early on, so if we change that, it may break all sorts of random
things.
Melanie
Sculpt/flexi/light are probably stored in the ExtraParams byte array.
The routines for deserializing that are in PrimitiveBaseShape.
Unfortunately this is one of those 'legacy' things that ended up that
way.Someone, a long time ago, exposed these options as the
ExtraParams byte array and
Hi everybody! I found a group project, and I can't get it set up. Can
anyone help me? I downloaded the SVN version, and have opensim 0.64 SVN.
When it says Apply the patch, it says it is incompatible. I tried opensim
0.64, 0.63, and even 0.62. Can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong? Also,
if
2. On your previous suggested ini stuff, in my opinion something like
UserService = { local | remote }
would be clearer than
LocalUserService = {True|False}
From what I remember, specifying remote is understandable even if the
services are actually on the
OK, let me backtrack. There are really two separate issues going on.
a) One issue is the means by which we specify different service
connectors. The dlls + entry class is the right way. Unfortunately, that
isn't in place yet, and I'm not sure I'm the right person to do it :-/
b) Another issue
17 matches
Mail list logo
