Re: [Opensim-dev] [linux-elitists] Mono considered harmful

2009-04-06 Thread Frisby, Adam
...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of James Stallings II Sent: Monday, 6 April 2009 5:25 AM To: opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] [linux-elitists] Mono considered harmful I'd love to participate in this conversation further, but for some reason I was placed on a 'must be moderated

Re: [Opensim-dev] [linux-elitists] Mono considered harmful

2009-04-06 Thread Sean Dague
James Stallings II wrote: > My Bad, looks like I'm off the must be moderated list. > My latest 0.02$L on the topic: > > Seems like we should at least consider an implementation in an alternate > language as a sort of backup. > > Maybe something much less a part of microsoft. Ironically I find thi

Re: [Opensim-dev] [linux-elitists] Mono considered harmful

2009-04-06 Thread James Stallings II
is widely believed that the Novell/MS pact disclaims these. > > I would highly suggest bringing this one over to the Mono mailing list, > > they have a lot more experience dealing with these claims. > > > > Adam > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ope

Re: [Opensim-dev] [linux-elitists] Mono considered harmful

2009-04-06 Thread James Stallings II
t;> >> Adam >> >> >> >> *From:* opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto: >> opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de] *On Behalf Of *Dzonatas >> *Sent:* Sunday, 5 April 2009 10:02 PM >> >> *To:* opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de >> *Subject:* Re:

Re: [Opensim-dev] [linux-elitists] Mono considered harmful

2009-04-06 Thread Frisby, Adam
v@lists.berlios.de<mailto:opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de> Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] [linux-elitists] Mono considered harmful Yeah, I did miss reasonable fees. However, it is widely believed that the Novell/MS pact disclaims these. I would highly suggest bringing this one over to the Mono mai

Re: [Opensim-dev] [linux-elitists] Mono considered harmful

2009-04-05 Thread Dzonatas
ge- From: opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:opensim-dev- boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Frisby, Adam Sent: Sunday, 5 April 2009 8:59 PM To: opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] [linux-elitists] Mono considered harmful Yeah, I did miss reasonable fees. Howev

Re: [Opensim-dev] [linux-elitists] Mono considered harmful

2009-04-05 Thread Frisby, Adam
.berlios.de [mailto:opensim-dev- > boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Frisby, Adam > Sent: Sunday, 5 April 2009 8:59 PM > To: opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de > Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] [linux-elitists] Mono considered harmful > > Yeah, I did miss reasonable fees. > >

Re: [Opensim-dev] [linux-elitists] Mono considered harmful

2009-04-05 Thread Frisby, Adam
im-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:opensim-dev- > boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Eugen Leitl > Sent: Sunday, 5 April 2009 11:34 AM > To: opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de > Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] [linux-elitists] Mono considered harmful > > - Forwarded message from Ri

Re: [Opensim-dev] [linux-elitists] Mono considered harmful

2009-04-05 Thread Teravus Ovares
In other words, Why don't you take this to the Mono development e-mail list. Because i'm sure that they have a lot more experience dealing with people who cherry pick the Microsoft/Mono thing.OpenSimulator is in .NET/Mono.That's the way it is. If you want to rewrite it in your favorite

Re: [Opensim-dev] [linux-elitists] Mono considered harmful

2009-04-05 Thread Teravus Ovares
You might as well let us know what simulator you actually support here while you're at it. If it isn't OpenSimulator on .NET/Mono, that's cool. Best Regards Teravus On 4/5/09, Eugen Leitl wrote: > - Forwarded message from Rick Moen - > > From: Rick Moen > Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 08:44:

Re: [Opensim-dev] [linux-elitists] Mono considered harmful

2009-04-05 Thread Eugen Leitl
- Forwarded message from Rick Moen - From: Rick Moen Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 08:44:08 -0700 To: linux-eliti...@zgp.org Subject: Re: [linux-elitists] [Opensim-dev] Mono considered harmful User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 Quoting Eugen Leitl (eu...@leitl.org): > IANAL, does below explan