[Originally sent this to Darren, but forgot to CC PSARC-ext]
Hi Darren,
I got forwarded a pointer to this case that you filed. Thanks for
taking the time to do this.
http://sac.eng/Archives/CaseLog/arc/PSARC/2009/430/20090811_darren.moffat
I would recommend using the certificate directory
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 09:24:00AM +0100, Darren J Moffat wrote:
johansen at sun.com wrote:
http://sac.eng/Archives/CaseLog/arc/PSARC/2009/430/20090811_darren.moffat
I would recommend using the certificate directory approach instead of
creating a single file with all certificates.
This case
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 04:02:15PM -0500, Rich.Brown at sun.com wrote:
== Introduction/Background ==
Zero-copy (copy avoidance) is essentially buffer sharing
among multiple modules that pass data between the modules.
This proposal avoids the data copy in the READ/WRITE path
of
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:17:34PM +0100, I. Szczesniak wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Garrett D'Amore gdamore at sun.com wrote:
On 02/22/10 11:28 AM, Roger A. Faulkner wrote:
I am sponsoring this automatic case for myself.
+1 on the case, on the justification for not
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 08:13:48AM -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
The fact that we have to put /usr/gnu at the head of $PATH of new
users is a bit of a travesty, and I'm of the opinion that we should
reexamine *that* particular decision...
This is merely one opinion. There are compelling
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 04:08:09PM -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
I'd rather see us modernize our own tools. I resent abdication of
our own engineering, and the necessity of abandoning all good
innovations (like shell builtins) because some people feel its
critical that the only way to achieve
