On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 10:56:09AM -0800, Stephen Hahn wrote:
>my initial suggestion is that we have a one or two build restricted
>integration period every three months. That means, roughly 5 - 6 open
>builds followed by 1 - 2 restricted ones.
>
>Thoughts?
For the record, I thi
* Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-12 01:15]:
> Stephen Hahn wrote:
> > but I don't see any point to changing bldenv's default path
> > settings. Can you characterize the problem or problems you see
> > these changes fixing?
>
> If we want to enforce portable scripting via using the POSI
> My next question is: why does ctfmerge prune the .hash section header
> from the elf object? When krtld loads unix it looks for the DT_HASH entry
> in the program headers to locate the hash data. However, ctfmerge flags
> .hash to be ignored so neither the header nor the corresponding data is
>
Problem fixed. Using -feliminate-unused-debug-types flag stops the production
of tens of thousands of things that causes ctfmerge to overflow its counter.
My next question is: why does ctfmerge prune the .hash section header from the
elf object? When krtld loads unix it looks for the DT_HASH en
Roland Mainz wrote:
If we want to enforce portable scripting via using the POSIX tools then
the tools in the Makefiles and in the "bldenv" interactive environment
should be identical. This is why I suggested to use
/usr/xpg6/bin:/usr/xpg4/bin before /usr/bin to make sure we use thos
features mand
Stephen Hahn wrote:
> * Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-04 18:18]:
> > Peter Memishian wrote:
[snip]
> > AFAIK first there would need to be a consens that replacing things like
> > /usr/bin/grep with /usr/xpg4/bin/grep etc. is "ok" (and add
> > /usr/xpg6/bin:/usr/xpg4/bin in front of the
