Re: [osol-discuss] KDE 3.4.1 for Solaris 10 IA32/AMD32 and UltraSPARC Released

2005-07-11 Thread Jim Grisanzio
Stefan Teleman wrote: On 7/10/05, John Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What type of volunteers are you looking for? Coders? Builders? Testers? Fans? ;-) All of the above. :-) Everyone who is interested has a role. it's a conversation. i will try my best to write down my thoughts in a

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Solaris vs. Linux

2005-07-11 Thread Sunil
you are illogical dude!! All I want to know if bash is present otherwise, does it matter if safe mode has another half a meg executable? is size the only concern? or illogical compatibility and safety restrictions apply here as well. work the damn incompatibilities if it means the world to so

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Solaris vs. Linux

2005-07-11 Thread Shawn Walker
On 7/11/05, Sunil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: opensolaris better learn from linux(or any OS for that matter) if it is to be adopted widely. the arrogance you show has brought many a down. Since no official opensolaris distribution exists, then any person that makes their own opensolaris

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Feature request

2005-07-11 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Dan Mick wrote: 1) I've never heard of /dev/fbs/aperture It's basically an open source version of xsvc included in Xorg for Solaris systems without xsvc (really ancient Solaris x86 or any version of Solaris SPARC).