On 8/19/05, Jim Grisanzio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Beijing users group:
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/os_user_groups/bjosug/
Ouch, missed that.The user group community is here:
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/os_user_groups/Also, the Chinese Users Community is being set up now. Siyuan
Hi Indro,
You need to tokenize your fcode to bytecode, using an fcode tokenizer such as
Toke - http://www.openbios.org/development/toke.html
Toke allows you to create a flash rom image that can be burned using the
vendors' flash update tool or other firmware flashers. There is some module in
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Teresa Giacomini wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm working on a plan for participation by Sun engineers at various
conferences in the coming months. Here is a list of conferences at
which we *hope* to have an (Open)Solaris presence (now through June
2006). What do you think?
All,
For those interested, some measurements of the last 2 months' activity
on OpenSolaris.org.
Weeks are defined as follows (Opening Day was a Tuesday, hence weeks run
Tuesday-Monday!)
WeekStart-End
1 06/14/05-06/20/05
2 06/21/05-06/27/05
3 06/28/05-07/04/05
4
On 8/19/05, W. Wayne Liauh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Lick -- 黎建溥 wrote
You are right though that there
hasn't been a comprehensive explanation of how the GPL is incompatible
with the CDDL though.
Since CDDL is based on MPL, some of the incompatibilities are explained in
Larry Rosen's
Having worked the Sun @ Supercomm booth several times, I know that we usually
do have a presence and a booth in the vendor area. Check with GSO marketing to
find out what the current status is. Cebit is very important, too.
-- richard
This message posted from opensolaris.org
James Lick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not all BSD style licenses are compatible with the GPL:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#OrigBSD
If you read that whole FAQ, you can see that the GPL has problems with a
lot of licensing systems. You can also see that there are ways to gain
Joerg Schilling wrote:
James Lick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not all BSD style licenses are compatible with the GPL:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#OrigBSD
If you read that whole FAQ, you can see that the GPL has problems with a
lot of licensing systems. You can also see that
Is it possible at this time to install OpenSolaris and use
pkgsrc/portage/pkg-get to get a complete working system. I am working at a
new job and need to learn solaris but miss bleeding edge BSD/Linux. Any help
and answers would be much appreciated
Nick
The views expressed on this message are
Thanks Richard. Will do. Joerg also mentioned CeBIT a while back.
When I checked into it, it seemed to be more of a tradeshow than a
conference. That is, lots of booths and pods, but not a lot of talks
and BoFs. Do I have that right?
T
Richard Elling wrote:
Having worked the Sun @ Supercomm
Al Hopper wrote:
Since we're discussing OpenSolaris I think you should expand the scope of
this discussion beyond Sun engineers and look at it from the perspective of
OpenSolaris participation at various conferences.
Absolutely. I tried to get that idea across in my original note, but
FYI, here is a comment from dgk:
| Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 15:22:39 -0400 (EDT)
| From: David Korn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| I do not know Sun's ARC process, but I have added some comments anyway.
| Let me know if there is anything that I can do to help.
| I get a lot of mail from users complaining
On 8/19/05, Robert W. Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yet, I seem to have missed the forest for the trees I'm inhabiting. Indeed,
the
cross pollination at the operating system level makes an even stronger case
for
compatibility between the GPL and CDDL licenses.
I don't follow the cross
Shawn Walker wrote:
If opensolaris ever went GPL, I'd be gone in an instant, and I suspect
others would as well. Because at that point, it would become useless
Nobody was suggesting that Open Solaris go GPL, merely that the license be
modified to be GPL compatible.
Shawn Walker wrote:
If opensolaris ever went GPL, I'd be gone in an
instant, and I suspect
others would as well. Because at that point, it
would become useless
Nobody was suggesting that Open Solaris go GPL,
merely that the license be
modified to be GPL compatible.
But what would that
On 8/19/05, Simon Phipps [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
If opensolaris ever went GPL, I'd be gone in an
instant, and I suspect
others would as well. Because at that point, it
would become useless
Nobody was suggesting that Open Solaris go GPL,
merely that the
Robert W. Fuller wrote:
Nobody was suggesting that Open Solaris go GPL, merely that the license be
modified to be GPL compatible.
If you can find one (i.e., GPL compatible), you really should patent it. :-)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Greetings All!
I'm pretty stoked that this is happening, I've been waiting for it for years.
Hopefully its not too late to make a difference.
All that aside, I'm preparing to evaluate opensolaris on an intel box, and have
a few goofy questions that I haven't been able to gather from the faq or
18 matches
Mail list logo
