Nathan Phan writes:
The course emphasized extensively on the placement of
each logical
volume's PP i.e. the above physical partitioning
(1016) layout...either
on the outer edge, middle or inner edge of the
cylinderical disk.
They allow you to specify where to place the PP, this
Eric Boutilier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In light of all the recent work that's been done to bring Debian PM
(apt) and Debian source repository support to Solaris, what would be the
advantage to using pkgsrc over Debian? (That is, unless you're talking
about having two package registries --
Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 13:34, Joerg Schilling wrote:
We would need a few simple extensions to pkgadd to increase the
usability.
Which are ?
It can already download packages over http or https (with support for
proxies specified in the
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 13:34, Joerg Schilling wrote:
We would need a few simple extensions to pkgadd to increase the usability.
Which are ?
It can already download packages over http or https (with support for
proxies
BTW: I see a http proxy option but no hint on how to use pkgadd via the
network.
pkgadd -d http://
Casper
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 13:44, Joerg Schilling wrote:
There are more (I curently don't remember the other ones) but the most
important
would be to make pkgadd able to autmatically install a list of packages in
the
right order,
BTW: I see a http proxy option but no hint on how to use
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 13:49, Richard Lowe wrote:
You're right though, it doesn't appear to be documented in pkgadd(1M),
or anywhere else I can find.
It is documented as the last sentence of the paragraph describing
the -d option on pkgadd(1m).
One other thing, packages (and patches) can also
Hi,
A couple of days back I did a little experiment with trying to use
Blastwave packages on BeleniX 0.3 (which includes the pkg* binaries
installed in harddisk and was successful after a few hiccups:
Blastwave packages have dependencies on SUNW packages (seems
a little curious to me). So the
Moinak Ghosh wrote:
So the point here is that C++ stuff compiled using Sun Studio requires
stuff that can is only available as part of Solaris Express or as part
of the
Sun Studio software itself. An OpenSolaris distro other than SX will not
be able to C++ code compiled using Sun Studio out
Dave Miner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The package sources are being actively worked on - the roadmap says
they'll be there this quarter, and we do believe that will be the case.
That's nice to hear.
I'm not sure what an OpenSolaris compliant sticker would be designed
to achieve, though, or
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Dave Miner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure what an OpenSolaris compliant sticker would be designed
to achieve, though, or why SVR4 packages are necessarily a part of it.
Well I hope that the proliferation of OpenSolaris-based distros doesn't
create a proliferation
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 17:19 -0800, Mike Ditto wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Dave Miner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure what an OpenSolaris compliant sticker would be designed
to achieve, though, or why SVR4 packages are necessarily a part of it.
Well I hope that the proliferation of
Michael T Kotlarski wrote:
The reason I need to kill the X server from ever starting is because
whatever the X-settings on this system are are incompatible with this
monitor (Viewsonic G773) causing it to have a frequency out of
range error. So, all solutions regarding in-X commands are not
Lars Tunkrans wrote:
Ben Rockwood wrote:
You said it, the HCL is the answer. The problem is that not enough
of us (myself included) are actually contributing enough to it. If
we'd all pitch in it'd be a much more useful resource. While the HCL
may have some limits, I don't think we can
14 matches
Mail list logo
