Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lars C wrote:
I think that a significant donation by Sun would not only help the OpenBSD
project
in sustaining the development of OpenSSH, but would also be a good public
relations opportunity.
Sun already has in the past made donations both
James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling writes:
I have a re-implementation in my libschily
[...]
* WARNING: a NULL constant is not a NULL pointer, so a caller must
* cast a NULL constant to a pointer: (char *)NULL
How's that?
This is a conclusion from the C
James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan Coopersmith writes:
Also, as I noted on IRC, strlcat() is close to this, and much safer.
snprintf is simpler still and just as safe.
This does not work in case the call to strlcat() would be done from
within a loop.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL
Rainer Orth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Keith M Wesolowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ask the Belenix or Nexenta guys. The stuff that Solaris RE uses isn't
available and probably never will be (and won't work anyway since ON
packages don't work yet). Note that you'll likely want more than
Hi All,
I was wondering if people still use Sun's csh.
I began to work on a bug found in the bug database about csh (
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4635088 ).
After I have fixed it, I thought maybe I could fix some other csh bugs since I
was inside its code.
I then
Jim Grisanzio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to Rich Lowe for these two fixes below and to Sarah Jelinek for
sponsoring the work through to putback. -- Jim
Putback 46
ID: 4759320
Desc: Read-only UFS global mounts should not try to turn on logging
Submitted by Richard Lowe on 12/07/05
Joerg Schilling writes:
How's that?
This is a conclusion from the C standard
I should have been more explicit. It seemed like a strange place for
a comment like this.
that:
strcatl(char *to, size_t tolen, ...)
but, then, that calls the return value into question. The
The MPLS project is an effort to support Multiprotocol Label Switching
(as described in IETF Standards-Track RFCs 3031, 3032, and others) on
Solaris. This protocol is roughly like X.25 or ATM, but in an
IP-centric context. It's useful for creating VPNs (Virtual Private
Networks), remote bridges,
SXCR is on track to be released on Friday (3/31).
Steve is working on a nightly sync up with onnv_37 that he will post in
the next day or so.
Thanks,
Karyn
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi Guys,
I just wanted to let you know that I fully ported (fixed some bugs,
added some features) and integrated HWDB client and server backend into
NexentaOS. It will be an integral part of upcoming Alpha 4 release.
Screenshots:
http://www.gnusolaris.org/gswiki/ErastBenson/HWDB_screenshots
--
This is in fact how its done. The important step is to add the set
pci_allow_pseudo_children=1 to the etc/system file, otherwise PCI will
not load the information. When I first tried to add device node
information to the dot-conf file pci wouldn't read it, but it was not
evident why it
James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a conclusion from the C standard
I should have been more explicit. It seemed like a strange place for
a comment like this.
If you did see the modifications done to my software by people from SuSE or
Debian, you would understand why I put
James Carlson wrote:
This is being proposed as an open project; anyone willing to
participate is welcome.
The initial leadership will be Pedro A. Aranda Gutiérrez and myself.
I second the proposal.
-Seb
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Hey Erast,
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 13:15 -0800, Erast Benson wrote:
Hi Guys,
I just wanted to let you know that I fully ported (fixed some bugs,
added some features) and integrated HWDB client and server backend into
NexentaOS. It will be an integral part of upcoming Alpha 4 release.
I was able to reproduce this bug id 4635088 on my Solaris 10u1 AMD XP chip
2000mhz, I do know of users that still use the csh and I still do as well! I
thinkg it's great that someone has intrest in these old outstanding issues,
that drives everyone nut's but never say's anything!
# csh
Server#
Hey All,
I am just installing B35 (X86), and noticed that the installer reports that
Entire Group and Entire Group Plus OEM are the same size at 3376.6 MB. I
guess that this is not quite correct...?
Regards... Sean.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Roland Mainz wrote:
Do you have any idea who may be interested in implementing the proposal
below ?
No, I don't, unfortunately. I get the feeling though that it is an
idea whose time has come.
Original Message
Subject: [osol-discuss] RFE: Replace /usr/css/bin/make with
James C. McPherson wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Do you have any idea who may be interested in implementing the proposal
below ?
No, I don't, unfortunately. I get the feeling though that it is an
idea whose time has come.
Well, the idea was already proposed a couple of times in the last
Sean Sprague wrote:
I am just installing B35 (X86), and noticed that the installer
reports that Entire Group and Entire Group Plus OEM are
the same size at 3376.6 MB. I guess that this is not quite
correct...?
Wild guessing: There are no OEM packages in this build so these install
clusters
Ben Rockwood wrote:
If there are any further issues, annoyances, requests or general
Genunix comments please, as usual, address them to Al Hopper and/or myself.
Is it possible to get a mailman list to which the diffs (gdiff -u) of
the changes are posted (similar to a CVS commit list most
Alan Burlison wrote:
and so on... at various points (not only in the perl subdirs) the
private files of the SVN repository (e.g. .svn*) are touched (AFAIK
this will likely happen with .cvs/ dirs, too) - IMO a bad thing... ;-(
This is a OpenSolaris B35 build, checked-out from
Stefan Parvu wrote:
We should think to have /bin/sh as ksh93. It is elegant
and simple to do. Are there any objections why /bin/sh
cannot be a ksh93 ?
This is unlikely to happen in the forseeable future. It's already
difficult enougth to convince Sun to switch /bin/ksh from ksh88 to ksh93
Stefan Parvu wrote:
Uaau, I see we have now a dedicated ksh93 migration forum:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=103
I hope folks will agree and get this fixed somehow.
stefan
This project has the goal to integrate ksh93 into (Open-)Solaris
including the update of /bin/ksh
James Carlson wrote:
Roland Mainz writes:
Beyond that point this issue it does not only affect Sun, it also
affects OpenSolaris and the related distributions which makes it a valid
email for this list.
It's perhaps worth noting that the ssh in Solaris is deliberately
SunSSH. Though it
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Felix Schulte wrote:
Yes. And Sun SSH is still vulnerable to X11keyboard sniffing. open
ssh has untrusted X11 forwarding for that - Sun SSH does not.
And how many people use it?
No clue. But it makes sense in some environments. And it's not
openssh.org's or
Roland Mainz wrote:
Ben Rockwood wrote:
If there are any further issues, annoyances, requests or general
Genunix comments please, as usual, address them to Al Hopper and/or myself.
Is it possible to get a mailman list to which the diffs (gdiff -u) of
the changes are posted (similar
26 matches
Mail list logo
